<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/100656/npm1100-charging-to-4-1v-with-vterm-fixed-to-vsys</link><description>After noticing poor capacity in a system with a 320mAh battery it turns out the battery is charged to 4.1v not 4.2 as planned. Solder pad C1, C2 and C3 are stringed together so there is no way for me to verify voltage level on C3 (VTERM) but I question</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:55:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/100656/npm1100-charging-to-4-1v-with-vterm-fixed-to-vsys" /><item><title>RE: NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/430439?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 10:55:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:50b88029-16f2-4eea-83f0-12da1691a1a0</guid><dc:creator>Kyrre Aalerud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Investigating what can cause a 100mV reduction in VTERM lead us to identify the battery protection!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vthigh_delta is 100mV and is the reduction applied to VTERM if battery is detected to be over 45v but below 60c. Due to earlier batterys not having a thermistor we did place the suggested 10k resistor on board similar to datasheet. However BOM error has caused this to still be placed in latest manufacture causing temperature interpretation to be very close to 45c. The error was not discovered until summer as temperature under appox 25-30c in room still leads to normal charging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those finding this later:&lt;br /&gt;NPM1100 can reduce VTERM by 100mV if it thinks battery is&amp;nbsp;between 45c and 60c.&lt;br /&gt;Make sure your NTC connection is correct!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/430388?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:31:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1cdd7a70-2854-4bdd-942a-a788922dddaf</guid><dc:creator>Kyrre Aalerud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;According to multiple articles including this ( &lt;a id="" href="https://www.powerstream.com/lithium-ion-charge-voltage.htm"&gt;https://www.powerstream.com/lithium-ion-charge-voltage.htm&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;) and our own tests we are lacking quite a large portion of capacity. (Which I&amp;nbsp;assume we gain as cycle life.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have been using the MAX17263 to report voltage and capacity via coulomb counting and the numbers appear to align with what we read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the VTERM can be changed at any time the use of VSYS or VBAT should not matter. Thus, is the reason for the low termination simply&amp;nbsp;errata on old devices that should not have been used in manufacture?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/430383?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:22:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:239ef27e-cd6b-4eb3-a1fb-9fe10a17d6bd</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;VTERM can be changed any time, including during charging. VBAT level is considered &amp;quot;logic high&amp;quot; for VTERM, so 4.2 V.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the internal resistance in the battery, the voltage measured on the outside (VTERM) will be higher than the internal voltage on cell when the charger is operating. When charging ends, you will hence measure lower voltage than VTERM. In any case, the difference in the charged capacity of the battery when the end voltage is 4.1 V vs 4.2 V is very little. If you are experiencing poor capacity, this is not caused by VTERM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The devices you have are rather old, and should not be used in production.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/430262?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 13:37:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:af6aa8fa-dd60-41bf-ba5a-8ec951c712d9</guid><dc:creator>Kyrre Aalerud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, since it is basically from datasheet I do not think that is a problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/7610.npm1100.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My concern is the statement that VTERM is fixed and should only be changed in powerdown, while datsheet recommends using VSYS which comes up on powerup. I checked and DEC also does this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What happens if VTERM connects to VBAT?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NPM1100 charging to 4.1v with VTERM fixed to VSYS</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/430255?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 13:21:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:764d7a4f-363c-4848-b2ec-5f6ec9d19950</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you share your schematic please?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>