<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NFC impedance interface</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/10075/nfc-impedance-interface</link><description>Hei,
We would be using nrf52 chip in a very miniature device that should have both BLE and NFC capability. NFC is needed for just as a tag. Thus, nrf52 is a good option. I have a doubt regarding the NFC impedance interface:
According to infocenter.nordicsemi</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:28:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/10075/nfc-impedance-interface" /><item><title>RE: NFC impedance interface</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/37355?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:28:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:78685496-6520-4f45-aa31-fba86488d570</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The main factor for designing the antenna coil should be that the size fits in your product. The NFC circuitry is only active when communicating over NFC, so power consumption is normally not a issue. The rest of the time, only the wake-on-field circuitry is active, which only draws &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/nrf52.v1.7/Chunk758405616.html?cp=1_1_0_38_13_0#unique_774195799"&gt;100 nA&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NFC impedance interface</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/37354?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:35:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c1580933-d9aa-4967-8ab9-ecfdb6f0ea28</guid><dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Einar for your the explanation. A follow-up question. What would be better approach: To design the NFC coil and equivalent circuit (with shunt capacitors) in such a way that there is large variation in parallel resistance (that includes Rin and R_ant) to get optimum voltage swing or small variation in parallel resistance to get optimum voltage swing, so that power consumption is minimized.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NFC impedance interface</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/37353?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:35:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:883255f0-1b12-4f39-8b18-423a54ca9582</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The NFC antenna can be viewed as a parallel resonant tank. At 13.56 MHz we would like the antenna to have its parallel resonant frequency, and this is adjusted by the capacitors to ground. The Q value/ parallel resistance of the antenna is internally adjusted automatically to get optimum voltage swing for NFC operation. The two capacitors are sufficient to position the parallel resonance for the antenna.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>