<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/101887/the-result-of-ppk2-is-too-different-with-it-of-keysight-6705c</link><description>I measure the same board with PPK2 and 6705C, but they show different result of the measurement. 
 The power supplied by PPK2 and 6705C with 3.6V. 
 PPK2&amp;#39;s average current is about 4-5mA, but 6705C&amp;#39;s average is about 1.4mA. 
 i have tested the PPK2 with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:56:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/101887/the-result-of-ppk2-is-too-different-with-it-of-keysight-6705c" /><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/442477?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:56:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3968c255-b3f7-4b76-aff1-c0a56b6df63d</guid><dc:creator>Priyanka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had already replied to your query 21 days back. Please go through that and let me know in case you have further doubts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Priyanka&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/442426?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 06:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47a6f2b3-d118-48dd-bd15-0104aa4d9b8d</guid><dc:creator>andy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/priyankakesav"&gt;Priyanka&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you reply it?&amp;nbsp; thanks a lot!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/440662?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:43:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:62f474fe-e285-4aad-b959-81b326ea1b11</guid><dc:creator>andy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;nbsp;did a comparison test using several different devices,&amp;nbsp;there are keysight 6705C ,&amp;nbsp; EFM32 Happy gecko starter kit,&amp;nbsp; Fluke 15B digital multimeter. but&amp;nbsp;only the ppk2&amp;nbsp;got the wrong measurement.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, i did another&amp;nbsp; simple test to&amp;nbsp; figure out&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;what the issue of ppk2 is, let me descript it below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691654912323v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1\&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Connect&amp;nbsp; VOUT_PPK2 and to the VOUT of PPK2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2\&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Generate a PWM plus from a MCU to switch on/off&amp;nbsp;Q1,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; and i measure the current throught the res R1 by PPK2(source meter mode)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3\&amp;nbsp; I change the period of the PWM ,&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;and got the wave of cureent&amp;nbsp; by PPK2&amp;nbsp; .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4\&amp;nbsp; I show the result of the wave below. i also&amp;nbsp;upload the data files export from PPK2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/1Kohm_5F00_3v3_5F00_1ms.ppk"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../1Kohm_5F00_3v3_5F00_1ms.ppk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/1Kohm_5F00_3v3_5F00_1sec.ppk"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../1Kohm_5F00_3v3_5F00_1sec.ppk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691655783633v5.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691655881659v7.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691656153418v9.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691656241133v10.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1691656400745v11.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/439273?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 12:57:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b4eeef69-0219-4bd9-8e98-23ace6c41737</guid><dc:creator>Priyanka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would suggest you to try redoing the measurements with a more precise settings on the instrument. Because it looks like&amp;nbsp;the measurement period of the 6705C readings is 20us, which means 50.000 samples/second AND the&amp;nbsp;PPK2 is set to double that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the picture of the&amp;nbsp;PPK, it seems like the waveforms look more clean and they do reach 0uA, while on&amp;nbsp;the other instrument, it never reach 0A. Also, as you used 2 PPK2s and got the same result, you can either use a third instrument or increase the accuracy of the 6705C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Priyanka&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/439234?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 11:20:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3b366904-41a8-4013-88b9-7a5a73763f64</guid><dc:creator>Priyanka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;br /&gt;Apologies for the delayed response. I am working on this and will get back to you soon. I have discussed this with the internal team and will update you as soon as I get a solid response.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Priyanka&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/438407?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:08:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b7455ae3-7115-48bc-be55-7ba21df4dce2</guid><dc:creator>andy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your reply,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1\&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I never change the advanced settings,&amp;nbsp; so it is the default value.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; the basic setting are below, Source meter, supply voltage is 3000mv,&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;100,000 samples per second, sample for 300 seconds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2\&amp;nbsp; I connect the GND and VOUT of the PPK to the DUT.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3\ My PPK is PPK2,&amp;nbsp; PCA63100 1.0.1 2022.30 C0E 3AC 4E&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Version of Power Profiler is 3.5.5&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: the result of PPK2 is too different with it of keysight 6705C</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/436447?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:46:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ba8adbf1-9aa3-495d-8a14-611fc1bc0744</guid><dc:creator>Priyanka</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking into this but please expect a slight delay as I am a bit occupied with another case and we are short staffed at the moment due to the summer vacation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime, could you describe your PPK2 setup? How did you connect it? Which version of PP kit is it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Priyanka&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>