<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>softdevice seems to have lower throughput then zephyr&amp;#39;s BLE stack ??</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/102607/softdevice-seems-to-have-lower-throughput-then-zephyr-s-ble-stack</link><description>Hello Nordic 
 i am working with nrf52832 and nrf52840 with ncs v2.3.0 
 i moved from Zephyr&amp;#39;s BLE stack to ncs sofdevcie by changing this config : &amp;quot; CONFIG_BT_LL_SW_SPLIT &amp;quot; from =y to =n. 
 i also had to change this config to higher value &amp;quot; CONFIG_NUM_PREEMPT_PRIORITIES</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 12:55:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/102607/softdevice-seems-to-have-lower-throughput-then-zephyr-s-ble-stack" /><item><title>RE: softdevice seems to have lower throughput then zephyr's BLE stack ??</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/440112?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 12:55:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5a69dd23-884b-49d7-94da-c619b73301f9</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you provide the sniffer logs for both cases to compare the payload?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Amanda H.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>