<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/102713/is-pairing-necessary-for-resolvable-private-address-feature</link><description>Hello, 
 I am using nrf52832 as a peripheral and running SD S112, nordic UART Profile and SDK 17.1.0 on it. 
 
 Is pairing always necessary for RPA feature? 
 Also, can you please point me to an example that uses RPA? 
 
 Thanks</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:56:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/102713/is-pairing-necessary-for-resolvable-private-address-feature" /><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/441247?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:56:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e6ed80c8-c191-41da-b70a-9285ae70019e</guid><dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/haakonsh"&gt;haakonsh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for the clarification.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/441246?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 19:52:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c7828df2-82cc-40bd-9600-7c5306cdf86e</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the private resolvable address is random, and that is what I&amp;#39;ve described earlier. The private resolvable address&amp;nbsp;can be decrypted(resolved) if you have its Identity Resolving Key.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/441205?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:42:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c2eeae1f-80dc-4a8f-b46a-86b1165b729b</guid><dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes I am looking for Random Private Address Feature. can it be resolvable?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/440896?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:35:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:76bc0097-349c-4b91-ba38-b7dff1696378</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Private Resolvable Address, perhaps&amp;nbsp;we&amp;#39;ve been miscommunicating. &lt;br /&gt;Do you mean Random Private Address(non-resolvable)?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If so then you only need to&amp;nbsp;call&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.s112.api.v7.3.0/group___b_l_e___g_a_p___f_u_n_c_t_i_o_n_s.html?cp=5_7_0_1_2_1_3_25#ga2203b7709d7178bc35e7f903bd0e913f"&gt;sd_ble_gap_privacy_set&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/440821?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 19:17:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c00cbdc9-b531-440a-bd6d-f65c14d39378</guid><dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your reply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do not plan to pair or bond the device. I was under impression that RPA needs pairing or bonding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I guess you clarified that it doesn&amp;#39;t and having a private resolvable key is sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May I know what does PRA stand for in your message?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Is pairing necessary for Resolvable Private Address feature?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/440778?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:59:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4f790098-2250-4eb1-b0d6-8e50db318363</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]Is pairing always necessary for RPA feature?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Technically no, but the wast majority of use-cases that include devices using PRA&amp;#39;s in a connection also include device authentication and encryption (pairing).&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you want two devices to establish a connection using PRAs then both devices needs to know each other&amp;#39;s Private Resolvable Key. And at that point you might as well include the rest of the pairing info as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do you not want to pair or bond your devices?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See also&amp;nbsp;examples\ble_peripheral\ble_app_hrs and&amp;nbsp;examples\ble_central_and_peripheral\experimental\ble_app_interactive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>