<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/103672/fem-control-with-nrf5340-current-consumption-too-high</link><description>I am using a nrf5340 on a custom board to control the nrf21540 FEM, with Zephyr. I have the FEM completely functional by forwarding the pins to the network core, and it works as necessary. Now in the final development here I am making sure that our current</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:05:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/103672/fem-control-with-nrf5340-current-consumption-too-high" /><item><title>RE: FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446373?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:05:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d3de7ae0-0878-4145-a900-81c9cb0c7f70</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Devin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You welcome, great to hear you found the solution &lt;span class="emoticon" data-url="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/emoji/1f642.svg" title="Slight smile"&gt;&amp;#x1f642;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will close the case then.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446159?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 00:55:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dbf1b4f1-58e2-4955-910e-218801ffd379</guid><dc:creator>Devin M</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It was due to the spi-if not being included in the nrf_fem section of the overlay node. I had to assign my spi module, with the pins listed in the lzc_fem spi module, with a name and assign that to spi-if.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446031?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:38:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cf01cd37-9481-401e-9361-3fe2876cf2f3</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Devin&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user="Devin M"]Thinking it may be due to the exemption of the spi-if portion of the&amp;nbsp;nrf21540_fem portion in the overlay currently. But will need to implement the SPI module passed through in&amp;nbsp;nrf21540_lcz_fem in order to be used for spi-if.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;You mean to say you are not using the official overlays provided by Laird?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will try to reach out to Laird as well, to hear if they have tested the sleep current of the module.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What kind of firmware are you running on the board?&amp;nbsp;Is it a standard Bluetooth application running the SoftDevice controller?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/445874?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:01:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1a509b55-3f8b-4836-989d-bde92c72fb91</guid><dc:creator>Devin M</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you! Yes, that does complicate it that the FEM control pins are not accessible for probing due to the module. Thinking it may be due to the exemption of the spi-if portion of the&amp;nbsp;nrf21540_fem portion in the overlay currently. But will need to implement the SPI module passed through in&amp;nbsp;nrf21540_lcz_fem in order to be used for spi-if.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM Control with nrf5340, Current Consumption too High.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/445862?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:30:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9b8b1982-b5df-4dde-94c6-387594186eed</guid><dc:creator>ovrebekk</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Devin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I asked around internally to see if this could be a known issue, but it doesn&amp;#39;t seem so.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I assume it would be difficult to get access to the FEM control pins on your module so you could check the state of these pins in sleep?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will do some measurements using&amp;nbsp;an nRF5340DK and the nRF21540EK trying to reproduce the problem here, and I will do my best to get back to you with an update in a day or two.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Torbjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>