<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF7002 Wi-Fi radio test mode TX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/103732/nrf7002-wi-fi-radio-test-mode-tx</link><description>Dear Team, 
 I have a question regarding the Wi-Fi radio TX test mode on the nRF7002-DK. I want to send Wi-Fi test packets of different sizes consecutively, which works fine. The problem is the delay between two packets sent consecutively. In NCS v2.4</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:37:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/103732/nrf7002-wi-fi-radio-test-mode-tx" /><item><title>RE: nRF7002 Wi-Fi radio test mode TX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446357?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 18:37:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:243b0718-3eb9-470b-b632-ee0643f67df8</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Raw packet feature is the one for this. We are working on it, and the development version will be available soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Amanda H.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF7002 Wi-Fi radio test mode TX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446212?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:24:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8cbb26fd-4b64-48d6-addc-c98edf3b19a9</guid><dc:creator>Rai</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Amanda,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thank you very much for addressing this issue and for your explanation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I assume that this &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot; / new command will not be implemented in the near future (if ever). Am I correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any other way to implement such functionality&amp;nbsp;in a different way (i.e., transmitting packets of different length with a inter-packet duration&amp;nbsp;less than 1ms and without having a valid Wi-Fi connection established).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rainer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF7002 Wi-Fi radio test mode TX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/446071?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 13:17:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:28d75f98-f819-4c42-aa3b-85ce72a5d438</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scope of the Radio test is to bring up the system and transmit the configured number of frames in a loop. Any configuration change ( length in this case) requires us to bring down the interface and bring it up again. Inter-packet duration observed in the above test is expected and as per the current design. We could add a new command to get the above functionality and that would be a new &amp;quot;requirement&amp;quot; to radio test. We could go to a few hundred 100us by adding a new command, but no promise for the schedule.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-Amanda H.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF7002 Wi-Fi radio test mode TX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/445945?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:18:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9176889b-f8fc-47cf-b321-0c59539a1c57</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking into this case and will reply later when I have enough information.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Amanda H.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>