<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Better mic solution for power constraint application than PDM</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/105386/better-mic-solution-for-power-constraint-application-than-pdm</link><description>Hi, 
 
 I want to use a microphone in our application consisting of BLE and some sensors. I need continuous sound recording and sending through BLE. Currently MP34DT05 is the one we are using but this a PDM mic ,and as I understood Nordic chip like nRF52832</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 15:41:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/105386/better-mic-solution-for-power-constraint-application-than-pdm" /><item><title>RE: Better mic solution for power constraint application than PDM</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/454972?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 15:41:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:71395b83-a300-4858-9633-68d93b1135c6</guid><dc:creator>Raoul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see, thanks. I don&amp;#39;t have anything to add in that case. Good luck with testing!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Raoul&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Better mic solution for power constraint application than PDM</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/454837?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 07:45:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ee3631cc-339d-446c-9863-8ae09603b6e4</guid><dc:creator>Hossein Kasaei</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Raoul,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="117489" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/105386/better-mic-solution-for-power-constraint-application-than-pdm/454804"]Those numbers look about right. From the PS you can see that the PDM + easyDMA consumes around 1.4 mA. I believe the HFCLK consumes around 900 uA.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your confirmation.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="117489" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/105386/better-mic-solution-for-power-constraint-application-than-pdm/454804"] Try the 3 methods on a DK, and measure their power consumption. I&amp;#39;m sorry to say that I don&amp;#39;t have any better alternative.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t mention it! I might test I2S to check the difference in power, but anyway I found that if I&amp;#39;m sending at least 100 bytes through BLE, the power goes high enough that even using different mic doesn&amp;#39;t help.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="117489" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/105386/better-mic-solution-for-power-constraint-application-than-pdm/454804"]Have you given any thought to the bit depth that you need? How low quality can you get away with?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;We rather to have at least 16 bit resolution and the ADC doesn&amp;#39;t offer a good one, That&amp;#39;s why I think of PDM and I2S.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Better mic solution for power constraint application than PDM</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/454804?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:04:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e35b4ea0-2b00-4314-8115-5054f876f2b9</guid><dc:creator>Raoul</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hossein,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Currently MP34DT05 is the one we are using but this a PDM mic ,and as I understood Nordic chip like nRF52832 doesn&amp;#39;t offer low power PDM peripheral and I&amp;#39;m getting the average current consumption of around 2.5mA[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Those numbers look about right. From the PS you can see that the PDM + easyDMA consumes around 1.4 mA. I believe the HFCLK consumes around 900 uA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I inquired internally on the power consumption of our I2S peripheral, but it seems that we don&amp;#39;t have data on this. A developer estimated that the consumption would be about the same as with PDM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They also suggested that the best way for you to proceed is to do tests yourself. Try the 3 methods on a DK, and measure their power consumption. I&amp;#39;m sorry to say that I don&amp;#39;t have any better alternative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for mentioning your required sampling rate. Have you given any thought to the bit depth that you need? How low quality can you get away with?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Raoul&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>