<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF Distance Measurement sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/108929/nrf-distance-measurement-sample</link><description>Hi, 
 I am testing the performance of NDT. 
 I have done many tests with the development board, and the results are as follows. 
 During the 3m and 5m tests, the error jitter is relatively large. 
 
 How to make distance measurement more stable? 
 Is</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 08:29:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/108929/nrf-distance-measurement-sample" /><item><title>RE: nRF Distance Measurement sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/472368?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 08:29:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:33d2a05f-3534-4f2d-9aba-b984fee53719</guid><dc:creator>PaKa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We highly recommend to use some kind of low pass filtering as well. A 3 stage median filter removes most outliers with minimum latency impact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF Distance Measurement sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/472343?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 03:25:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a381e4ac-84cf-4aaa-af12-8a2abf2f5d90</guid><dc:creator>kenlove</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;Simon&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;According to your suggestion, I will re-test and use DK at both ends.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;If you have the test data, you can also provide it to me.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kenlove&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF Distance Measurement sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/472259?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 14:27:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:17751205-3f05-4ec9-9f44-885abcb7a988</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you using an nRF52840 DK on both sides of the test? If not, what are you using on the other side for testing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to get better and more stable results, you could enable the &lt;a href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/latest/nrf/samples/bluetooth/nrf_dm/README.html#high-precision-calculation"&gt;High-precision calculation, t&lt;/a&gt;hat does a more compute-intensive high-precision distance calculation by setting the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title="(in Kconfig reference v&amp;amp;nbsp;)" href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/latest/kconfig/index.html#CONFIG_DM_HIGH_PRECISION_CALC"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span&gt;CONFIG_DM_HIGH_PRECISION_CALC&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;Kconfig option.&amp;nbsp;High-precision calculation has an impact on MCPD ranging mode only. It also seems like you could do with the calibration explained in the section below the high-precision, as there is an ~70 cm offset in most of your measurements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>