<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nPM1300 BUCK1 and BUCK2 efficiencies lower than expected</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/109016/npm1300-buck1-and-buck2-efficiencies-lower-than-expected</link><description>Hello, 
 We received directly from Nordic samples of the nPM1300 revision C. 
 
 
 We are aware that according to the errata, the efficiencies of BUCK1 and BUCK2 should be 10% less than expected from the datasheet. 
 
 
 We measure the efficiencies and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:54:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/109016/npm1300-buck1-and-buck2-efficiencies-lower-than-expected" /><item><title>RE: nPM1300 BUCK1 and BUCK2 efficiencies lower than expected</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/472948?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:54:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4177c1e2-b492-4026-9eb8-fad3a2449bf6</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]Is it something already known for this revision? [/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, this is a known issue.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Will it be improved?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;It will be improved in the next revision that&amp;#39;s avalable in Q3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Can you share the setup used for the measurements?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;The setup you have seems to be good already.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>