<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bluetooth Qualification - RF-PHY</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/10903/bluetooth-qualification---rf-phy</link><description>Hello Nordic-- 
 We&amp;#39;re most of the way through qualification testing on an nrf51822 and the testing house had a question about the PIXIT values for RF-PHY testing. I sent them the PIXIT values Nordic suggested from here and they replied back saying that</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:47:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/10903/bluetooth-qualification---rf-phy" /><item><title>RE: Bluetooth Qualification - RF-PHY</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/40773?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:47:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b3791cf3-d240-4129-bafe-71942d82668c</guid><dc:creator>Nick Pelis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth Qualification - RF-PHY</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/40772?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:51:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:26a07fb6-beb4-4b4a-80f1-16ad5dd492b8</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The inband frequency is (2400 + NRF_RADIO-&amp;gt;FREQUENCY + &lt;strong&gt;4&lt;/strong&gt;) [MHz]. Normal test cases are channel 2/40/80 (ie: low, mid, and high channel)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looks like the test house has used &amp;quot;+2&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;+4&amp;quot; as the inband frequency offset.
Not a huge problem, as the test still passes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,
Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>