<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52840 BLE Coded PHY errata 3.15 and 3.24 - Does nRF Connect SDK have workarounds?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/109976/nrf52840-ble-coded-phy-errata-3-15-and-3-24---does-nrf-connect-sdk-have-workarounds</link><description>We&amp;#39;re using the nRF52840 with Zephyr in the nRF Connect SDK. Our current firmware build is using the SDK v2.3.0. 
 For some important BLE links we&amp;#39;re using the Coded PHY (S8, 125kbps), and saw the following two related errata for this part (we&amp;#39;re using</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:05:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/109976/nrf52840-ble-coded-phy-errata-3-15-and-3-24---does-nrf-connect-sdk-have-workarounds" /><item><title>RE: nRF52840 BLE Coded PHY errata 3.15 and 3.24 - Does nRF Connect SDK have workarounds?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/479858?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:05:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fd97ed20-db31-4a5f-acc8-b1bee088feb5</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, that is supported. Please make a new question&amp;nbsp;if you have more questions about that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52840 BLE Coded PHY errata 3.15 and 3.24 - Does nRF Connect SDK have workarounds?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/479799?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1c23941c-2b91-4fc4-98bc-14b5ad175133</guid><dc:creator>harsheshvalera</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/eith"&gt;Einar Thorsrud&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does that mean latest nRF Connect SDK supports LE Coded phy S8 in both RX and TX with 125kbps? We are looking for long range only.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52840 BLE Coded PHY errata 3.15 and 3.24 - Does nRF Connect SDK have workarounds?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/477851?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:14:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:51b1108e-ac60-4470-bc3e-e4e8131ee108</guid><dc:creator>wkpolara</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Great, thank you for the quick response!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52840 BLE Coded PHY errata 3.15 and 3.24 - Does nRF Connect SDK have workarounds?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/477558?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:25:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3c2b347f-7df3-4f53-9ad2-e87a150ce687</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nRF Connect SDK v2.3.0 inclues workarounds for both errata 172 and 191 when using the &lt;em&gt;SoftDevice Controller&lt;/em&gt; and you do not need to do anything on your end to enable the workarounds. It is also handled for the Zephyr controller, though I would recomend that you use the SoftDevice Controller for other reasons (this is the only controller we recomend for production, and the only we qualify).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>