<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/110630/p0-25-and-p0-26-more-likely-than-other-pins-to-oscillate-if-left-floating</link><description>I have two products which are very similar. They differ in which pins are mapped to which functions. Let&amp;#39;s call the Product A and Product B. 
 I made a mistake and left two of the pins as floating inputs. This led to increased current consumption in System</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:08:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/110630/p0-25-and-p0-26-more-likely-than-other-pins-to-oscillate-if-left-floating" /><item><title>RE: P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/481297?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:08:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3b87e6ce-bc0b-4441-8bfb-5840a3bad64d</guid><dc:creator>mathiaso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok. That was quite an increase. And that only was present on 5 % of the devices with P0.25 and P0.26 floating? Did you try resoldering any of those?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m happy to hear it is solved now, at least.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/481161?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:28:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e7110ac2-3bec-441c-b873-b652d7368a67</guid><dc:creator>epower</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s correct. I&amp;#39;m not seeing increased current draw anymore now that I&amp;#39;m not leaving any pins floating. The amount of current varied from device to device, but was as high as 50uA in the worst cases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/481126?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:03:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:44dd913c-2da8-495d-9122-1bc90371822e</guid><dc:creator>mathiaso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What numbers kind of numbers are we talking about for the increased current draw?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now you don&amp;#39;t see the increased current consumption in any of the devices anymore, right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/480941?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 22:41:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6dc4f07e-128a-425a-9755-ca90978c20f2</guid><dc:creator>epower</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Mathias, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because I did see these pins in particular cause increased current draw in System OFF mode when they were floating, do you think I should be concerned about the integrity of these particular parts?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: P0.25 and P0.26 more likely than other pins to oscillate if left floating?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/480925?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:24:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ad34f4e1-a90a-49ba-be51-e9e41bebb58c</guid><dc:creator>mathiaso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Evan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, Errata 138 should not lead to increased current consumption in System OFF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Mathias&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>