<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Can you fix NRF_LOG* in SDK 11?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/11079/can-you-fix-nrf_log-in-sdk-11</link><description>Not sure if forums or MyPage support requests are better for this. 
 It seems NRF_LOG has taken a step backward from what was used in the previous nRF52 0.9.2 SDK. What I&amp;#39;ve discovered is that there is no buffering at all taking place. If the remote</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:01:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/11079/can-you-fix-nrf_log-in-sdk-11" /><item><title>RE: Can you fix NRF_LOG* in SDK 11?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/41441?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:01:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:34af3d5a-68b4-4d3a-9cbc-307189df1c7f</guid><dc:creator>Richard von Lehe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;See my comment above and Wojtek&amp;#39;s suggestion.  I had forgotten that in the previous SDK I had swapped out app_uart and replaced it with app_fifo and app_uart_fifo.  This works for me with IAR now, and I&amp;#39;ll eventually figure out why it&amp;#39;s not working for me with gcc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Can you fix NRF_LOG* in SDK 11?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/41439?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 19:59:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e59ad3fb-a90b-4192-983b-2009669bbe6f</guid><dc:creator>Richard von Lehe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, all is well.  I had completely forgotten that it is possible to swap &lt;em&gt;out&lt;/em&gt; app_uart.c and swap &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; app_fifo.c and app_uart_fifo.c.  I was able to do that with the new SDK.  It seems the normal non-fifo UART functionality is not very useful, at least for my purposes.  I also got RTT logging to work, and that might come in handy at some point, but it seems like it would be a bit less convenient since it ties up the JLINK connection.  Maybe I need to look in to that further, as there must be a way to debug and view RTT logging simultanteously.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In any case, I&amp;#39;m marking this answered.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Can you fix NRF_LOG* in SDK 11?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/41440?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2015 12:26:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b0361c05-7646-4b84-8004-4001436bed8d</guid><dc:creator>Wojtek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can use flow control or fifo version of app_uart to get rid of that problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>