<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52 data rate</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/112373/nrf52-data-rate</link><description>With the change from nRF51 to nRF52, the data rate became a minimum of 1 Mbps. 
 
 Nordic proprietary radio mode, 
 nRF51 250 Kbps. 
 nRF52 1 Mbps, 
 
 What is the difference in communication range and current consumption?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:58:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/112373/nrf52-data-rate" /><item><title>RE: nRF52 data rate</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/490265?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:58:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5b35df19-26d3-4dc9-82db-896042364127</guid><dc:creator>SwRa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The nRF51 is very old product from Nordic and there are several Devzone tickets comparing nRF51 and nRF52 series like these:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/21889/nrf52-and-nrf51-beacon-range"&gt;NRF52 and NRF51 (Beacon) Range&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; For the power consumption, you can use the online power profiler to check the consumption on thenRF52 and nRf53 series:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/power/w/opp"&gt;https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/power/w/opp&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;There are no similar tools for the nRF51 series, but the nRF52 series has better power consumption.. The nRF51 is not recommended for new BLE designs anymore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Range will depend on antenna and environment, and we can&amp;#39;t really provide any value here as everyone test it differently (it can be as short as 10m or as long as 100m). You should get a kit and try it out in your environment to know how it performs.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swathy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>