<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/112571/has-a-regression-snuck-in-to-the-ppk-stack</link><description>We&amp;#39;ve had good success measuring power consumption with the PPK2 until now. But recently, it started reporting some hard-to-explain numbers. Specifically, t told me a nRF9160 was drawing 40 uA, but I had an UART RX interrupt active, which should mean</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:30:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/112571/has-a-regression-snuck-in-to-the-ppk-stack" /><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491739?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2024 07:30:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1a6813e0-9d61-41ed-941b-dbc195a1ebd0</guid><dc:creator>AHaug</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s an update letting you know that the PPK2 team is looking into the issue, but that they will need some more time to verify if new firmware resolves the issue. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Edit: Hopefully the new release that should come during this summer will not have this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491455?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:23:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:589d7aae-6942-4917-8876-c96258ed3623</guid><dc:creator>benjamin-eub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;And I should note that the customer that observed the same impossible numbers was running on Intel...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491454?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:21:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6a53524f-b1c7-4230-a0e8-e5e220f80368</guid><dc:creator>benjamin-eub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I do not sadly, just an observation from some guy at the Zephyr Discord. He said the same thing as you however - this was only observable on certain USB ports and not at all on others.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491386?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:24:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bac1a342-215b-456a-b0eb-9071267f6263</guid><dc:creator>Achim Kraus</dc:creator><description>[quote userid="123704" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/112571/has-a-regression-snuck-in-to-the-ppk-stack/491324"]AMD chipset bug[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Hm ... my experience may also point in that direction. If I plug the PPK II direct to the PC, the numbers sometime doesn&amp;#39;t make sense. If I plug it in the USB-Hub of my KMV-switch, the numbers are better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you have some more details about that AMD chipset bug?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491324?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:18:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d25ec59d-00be-4b80-8c04-bdfcea7310d2</guid><dc:creator>benjamin-eub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Note: someone at the Zephyr Discord hinted at an AMD chipset bug could&amp;#39;ve caused this?? Sounds absolutely insane, but I DO run AMD...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491317?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:03:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c004061b-7246-415b-839c-cdcb1c2c2a85</guid><dc:creator>AHaug</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve piped this query to the PPK team for investigation. I will check in with them and you next week for a status w.r.t the bug investigation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for reporting this, I&amp;#39;ll get back to you!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards;&lt;br /&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Has a regression snuck in to the PPK stack?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/491290?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:58:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a3185dc9-6103-4696-b46a-dc7226f6dc88</guid><dc:creator>benjamin-eub</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Note: turns out the method of Joulescope + PPK in parallel introduced too much noise for the results to be reliable. But I stand by my observations.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>