<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Using app_timer to implement RT clock &amp;amp; calendar?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/11301/using-app_timer-to-implement-rt-clock-calendar</link><description>Hi, 
 In my application I need to keep both time and date so I need a real time clock &amp;amp; calendar (RTCC). I was planning to use on the nRF51 real time counter (RTC) to implement my own RTCC, but RTC0 is used by the S110 and RTC1 is used by the app_timer</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:24:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/11301/using-app_timer-to-implement-rt-clock-calendar" /><item><title>RE: Using app_timer to implement RT clock &amp; calendar?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/42507?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:24:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:61497276-97b6-4fab-8fbd-b0be9d532b83</guid><dc:creator>RK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;No real difference between using an app_timer and using a free RTC, which you are correct in this case you don&amp;#39;t have as both RTCs are in-use. It&amp;#39;s still interrupt-based, it still wakes up on a regular interval and increments a counter, doing it via app_timer instead of a dedicated RTC runs more code because the app_timer is reasonably complicated, but it&amp;#39;s still basically pretty low power, especially if you&amp;#39;re waking up often for bluetooth events to occur anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Accuracy may not be particularly great however, a few seconds a day of drift is possible. The RTCC chips also often provide calendar functions with rollover and leap years and useful stuff, so if that&amp;#39;s important to you as well as low power, that might be another reason to use a separate chip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>