<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Confirmation on NRF5340 vs iOS thoughput results</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/114113/confirmation-on-nrf5340-vs-ios-thoughput-results</link><description>Hi, 
 We have modified the throughput example of NRF5340, v2.6.1 SDK to achieve around 600 Kbps for iOS app. Attached is the sniffer trace. 
 Can anyone confirm that the data rate is actually 600 Kbps from the trace ? Any suggestions to achieve more speed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:02:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/114113/confirmation-on-nrf5340-vs-ios-thoughput-results" /><item><title>RE: Confirmation on NRF5340 vs iOS thoughput results</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/499600?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:02:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d4c5a4e5-a017-4601-8eab-4ea99e56b10b</guid><dc:creator>VinuGopalakrishnan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Vidar!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Confirmation on NRF5340 vs iOS thoughput results</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/499405?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:36:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:51fb6743-64a9-469a-904e-45962898483a</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Vinu,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;iOS limits the maximum throughput, and I believe 600 kbps is about as fast as you can achieve. I don&amp;#39;t recall getting better results than that. Android phones tend to be faster. When it comes to the WS capture, I&amp;#39;m not able to tell if it&amp;#39;s correctly measuring the effective throughput (i.e. the actual payload not including packet headers). I would suggest that you measure the throughput in the FW app like in the throughput sample to confirm this.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vidar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>