<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GNSS Behavior with nRF9151 on Firmware v2.0.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/115148/gnss-behavior-with-nrf9151-on-firmware-v2-0-1</link><description>Hi, 
 Since we started testing the new nRF9151 with the latest modem firmware (v2.0.1), we’ve noticed a change in GNSS behavior compared to the nRF9161/v1.3.6. 
 Recently, the number of tracked satellites increases rapidly to a high value, only to drop</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 08:49:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/115148/gnss-behavior-with-nrf9151-on-firmware-v2-0-1" /><item><title>RE: GNSS Behavior with nRF9151 on Firmware v2.0.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/505123?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 08:49:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1a6784cf-c500-4a2f-9a28-0d08bcd9f552</guid><dc:creator>dejans</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Markus,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What you observed is expected behavior when using modem firmware v2.0.1. We have already tuned tracked satellite reporting and this improved implementation will be included in modem firmware v2.0.2.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Dejan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GNSS Behavior with nRF9151 on Firmware v2.0.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/504951?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:44:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8831729a-d4ef-439f-a7f6-5d3d105994d7</guid><dc:creator>mrks115</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dejan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Did you test on your custom board or on the nrf9151-dk?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;On our custom board, we currently don&amp;#39;t have any 9151 devkits. Antenna performance, compared to nrf9160 devkit and other nrf9160 boards, is &amp;quot;very good&amp;quot;, at least as good as on the other boards.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Is there a periodicity to the event you observed? What is the time interval between rapid increases of the number of satellites?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This happens every time we do a GNSS search. As far as I have observed it, the increase mostly happens after 10s, but not always, so I&amp;#39;m not sure if this is just a coincidence. Sometimes it is 6s, sometimes 2s (like in the sample above), etc.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Most of the time it looks like the following (under okay-ish conditions near a window, but far away to not getting a valid fix in time):&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;[00:15:05.109,191]  0 s - Tracking:  0     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 0       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:06.094,146]  0 s - Tracking:  1     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 1       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:07.096,130]  1 s - Tracking:  2     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 2       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:08.096,343]  2 s - Tracking:  2     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 2       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:09.098,205]  3 s - Tracking:  2     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 2       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:10.096,405]  4 s - Tracking:  2     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 1       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:11.097,381]  5 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 1       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:12.096,496]  6 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:13.098,968]  7 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:14.099,975]  8 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:15.100,372]  9 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  0       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:16.118,865] 11 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  0       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:16.901,153] 11 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  0       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:17.903,686] 12 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  2       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:18.904,815] 13 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  2       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:19.905,120] 14 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  3       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:20.906,646] 15 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  3       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:21.918,823] 16 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  5       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:22.917,846] 17 s - Tracking: 10     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 10      Using:  5       Unhealthy: 1
[00:15:23.885,955] 18 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:24.887,603] 19 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:25.888,031] 20 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:26.891,510] 21 s - Tracking:  3     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:27.909,454] 22 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  4       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:28.906,097] 23 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:29.906,524] 24 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:30.889,221] 25 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:31.889,190] 26 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 3       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:32.895,324] 27 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:33.894,653] 28 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:34.890,106] 29 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0
[00:15:35.893,280] 30 s - Tracking:  4     C/N0&amp;gt;0: 4       Using:  3       Unhealthy: 0&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Currently I&amp;#39;m testing with the latest Modem FW beta you gave me, it&amp;#39;s still the same behavior.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Markus&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: GNSS Behavior with nRF9151 on Firmware v2.0.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/504497?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 09:31:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3b3d99b9-4291-4ce7-a8d3-c90d7fb58a61</guid><dc:creator>dejans</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Markus,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Since we started testing the new nRF9151 with the latest modem firmware (v2.0.1), we’ve noticed a change in GNSS behavior compared to the nRF9161/v1.3.6.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Did you test on your custom board or on the nrf9151-dk?&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Recently, the number of tracked satellites increases rapidly to a high value, only to drop significantly after some time. I can observe this regularly. The previous behavior was a more gradual increase or decrease in the satellite count.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Is there a periodicity to the event you observed? What is the time interval between rapid increases of the number of satellites?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Dejan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>