<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>I am trying to use 4 pairs of I2C on nRF5340, why is one behaving differently?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/115350/i-am-trying-to-use-4-pairs-of-i2c-on-nrf5340-why-is-one-behaving-differently</link><description>Hello, 
 As mentioned in the title, I am trying to use 4 pairs of I2C on nRF5340. Each of the four I2C pairs will be connected to a TCA9548A (I2C MUX), but that is not important. 
 In the test program, each of the four pairs of I2C are threaded, so they</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 07:53:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/115350/i-am-trying-to-use-4-pairs-of-i2c-on-nrf5340-why-is-one-behaving-differently" /><item><title>RE: I am trying to use 4 pairs of I2C on nRF5340, why is one behaving differently?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/505664?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 07:53:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6f74329a-86b3-425b-a7d1-c10b3c02ba65</guid><dc:creator>Yoshihiro Goto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My apologies, I completely forgot that P0.0 and P0.1 were assigned different functions.&lt;br /&gt;I changed the pin as you advised and it worked fine. Thank you very much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Yoshihiro Goto&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: I am trying to use 4 pairs of I2C on nRF5340, why is one behaving differently?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/505588?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 13:23:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7748c8ac-d02c-4290-b4a9-a2e06380ac20</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Yoshihiro&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This seemed very strange at first, but I think this could be related to the pins you&amp;#39;ve chosen for the I2C0 instance, as these by default are used by the 32.768kHz crystal and thus might behave a bit differently. I can&amp;#39;t see in your project that you&amp;#39;ve set the nRF53 to use the internal RC oscillator instead of the external LF crystal which is the default by setting&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/kconfig/index.html#CONFIG_CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_K32SRC_RC"&gt;CONFIG_CLOCK_CONTROL_NRF_K32SRC_RC&lt;/a&gt;=y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have, and I&amp;#39;ve just missed it, I would either way try using some other GPIOs than P0.00 and P0.01 as the I2C0 GPIOs to check if the same behavior is seen on any pins or just these two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>