<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Impedance Control nrf9151 RF Design</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/116749/impedance-control-nrf9151-rf-design</link><description>Hello, 
 It has been a while since I have done any controlled impedance and was wondering if someone could provide me a quick sanity check before I continue: 
 Here is the board stack up. I am using the top copper(L1) as waveguide and L2 as ground: 
</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:09:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/116749/impedance-control-nrf9151-rf-design" /><item><title>RE: Impedance Control nrf9151 RF Design</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/513559?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:09:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c7192d60-d330-4bea-9537-abbe220094a3</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>[quote user="Doug K"]I have also looked at the NRF9160DK and that dev kit is making more sense on how traces are laid out.&amp;nbsp;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Great, yeah it might be better to have a look at that. The 9151DK stands out a bit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the designer we change the trace width on that for a very silly reason related to particularities of the stack-up we have there&amp;nbsp;(mainly L1-L2 distance is dictated by laser vias from L1 to L2). If you do not need laser vias then choose another configuration or materials.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;You shouldn&amp;#39;t need to worry about this or width changes, just keep one that gives you 50Ω.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;Let me know if there is anything else.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:inherit;"&gt;Elfving&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Impedance Control nrf9151 RF Design</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/513496?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 17:02:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0ef1a59f-caf6-471b-aec3-8aa302655b58</guid><dc:creator>Doug K</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mostly wanted to use the reference design to confirm my calculations. I will have this conversation with my manufacturer and see what they recommend.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have also looked at the NRF9160DK and that dev kit is making more sense on how traces are laid out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Impedance Control nrf9151 RF Design</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/513485?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:38:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f8354c27-1871-480a-8bfa-56845eb69e9c</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry about the wait Doug, I guess this sanity check wasn&amp;#39;t as quick as you&amp;#39;ve hoped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I had a talk with the designer behind the 9151DK.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;L1-L2 distance&amp;nbsp;should be ~0.075mm. Unless you are 100% replicating the pcb there is no need to do the transition.&amp;nbsp;Our&amp;nbsp;recommendation to all impedance related question is to specify what impedance you want and ask your manufacturer to adjust the final dimensions to fit the build. We also rely on our manufacturers to control impedances for us.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems like you know what you are on the right path, though some input from your manufacturer would probably help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1733325830542v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elfving&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Impedance Control nrf9151 RF Design</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/512412?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:03:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5beb9446-df3c-4d9e-9c33-7b213ed96baa</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Doug,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am looking into it, though I&amp;#39;ll have to get back to you on this. This is unfortunately not something I know myself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elfving&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>