<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF Connect SDK Intermediate course - Lesson 4, Exercise 1 PWM terminology</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/116872/nrf-connect-sdk-intermediate-course---lesson-4-exercise-1-pwm-terminology</link><description>In this exercise the PWM terminology is used incorrectly, confusing the pwm pulse width (nsecs) and duty cycle (percentage). I know the difference from 40+ years of designing PWM circuits and firmware, but your lesson will confuse people that are new</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:58:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/116872/nrf-connect-sdk-intermediate-course---lesson-4-exercise-1-pwm-terminology" /><item><title>RE: nRF Connect SDK Intermediate course - Lesson 4, Exercise 1 PWM terminology</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/518867?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:58:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7b4b0c4c-7f24-4403-8050-249ef4a73c33</guid><dc:creator>AHaug</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Again thank you for bringing this up. The courses should be updated shortly to reflect the change from using &amp;quot;duty cycle&amp;quot; to using &amp;quot;pulse&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;pulse width&amp;quot; instead when referring to a duration and no the ratio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF Connect SDK Intermediate course - Lesson 4, Exercise 1 PWM terminology</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/512953?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 11:48:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6dd811fb-077a-4a61-b730-e5d1163dfa8e</guid><dc:creator>runsiv</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Glenn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bringing this up. I will bring this up in devAcademy meeting on Wednesday.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Runar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF Connect SDK Intermediate course - Lesson 4, Exercise 1 PWM terminology</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/512867?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:32:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2525828d-0804-4eff-8443-aa0b80faa53a</guid><dc:creator>Saxman58</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In Exercise 2 the problem is even worse, with the term duty cycle (which is a ratio or percentage) used instead of the pulse width (time, e.g.- msecs) throughout the exercise.&amp;nbsp; The servo motor data sheet also incorrectly shows &amp;quot;duty cycle&amp;quot; on the timing diagram but with units of msecs.&amp;nbsp; This is less surprising since it may have been translated from Chinese or something.&amp;nbsp; But every control systems reference I&amp;#39;ve ever seen makes it clear that duty cycle is the ratio of the pulse width to the period, usually expressed as a percentage:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_cycle"&gt;en.wikipedia.org/.../Duty_cycle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>