<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/117448/address-issue-testing-the-smp-server-sample-on-the-nrf54l15dk</link><description>Hello ! 
 I&amp;#39;m wandering what is this warning when building the sample for the nrf54L15dk : 
 unit address and first address in &amp;#39;reg&amp;#39; (0x5004c000) don&amp;#39;t match for /soc/peripheral@50000000/vpr@4c000/mailbox@1 
 My build configuration: - board target : nrf54l15dk</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:50:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/117448/address-issue-testing-the-smp-server-sample-on-the-nrf54l15dk" /><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/518387?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 08:50:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2c5a515d-81da-4852-abbe-fc5803d9ea8f</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>[quote user="BeekBoy2002"]I don&amp;#39;t like warnings from code being generated.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;I agree. I pinged our developers about this. Hopefully it will be fixed before the next release.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/517617?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:be5bf4e4-2edd-41f1-a557-2d2ac7224d13</guid><dc:creator>BeekBoy2002</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As mentioned the lines 39...48 of the file&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;zephyr/dts/arm/nordic/nrf54l_05_10_15_cpuapp.dtsi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;	cpuapp_vevif_rx: mailbox@1 {
		compatible = &amp;quot;nordic,nrf-vevif-event-rx&amp;quot;;
		reg = &amp;lt;0x0 0x1000&amp;gt;;
		status = &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot;;
		interrupts = &amp;lt;76 NRF_DEFAULT_IRQ_PRIORITY&amp;gt;;
		#mbox-cells = &amp;lt;1&amp;gt;;
		nordic,events = &amp;lt;1&amp;gt;;
		nordic,events-mask = &amp;lt;0x00100000&amp;gt;;
	};
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Anyway, lets hope it will be fixed soon due to the fact I don&amp;#39;t like warnings from code being generated.&lt;br /&gt;We would like to use the vpr core to do QSPI to external FLASH memory.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/517611?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2025 08:27:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c71f3318-7a55-4282-9a81-227b9cdcd740</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Removing the lines 39...48 from where exactly?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But yes, I agree. This is a bug, but unless you are using the vpr core, it shouldn&amp;#39;t matter. It is reported internally. And the warning in itself doesn&amp;#39;t affect an application that is running independent of the vpr core.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/517531?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:870eedf9-5c5f-448b-8d7f-8964648bf8ba</guid><dc:creator>BeekBoy2002</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Facing the same warning and it is caused by the definition of mailbox@1&amp;nbsp;in the file zephyr/dts/arm/nordic/nrf54l_05_10_15_cpuapp.dtsi (line 39).&lt;br /&gt;Removing the lines 39...48 will solve the generation of the warning.&lt;br /&gt;Of course the communication between different cores (cpuapp and vpr) will probably not be fully functional.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/517013?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 14:07:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4012a86a-1784-408c-bba0-87cdac9039fc</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still haven&amp;#39;t heard back from our developers, but I assume that this will not cause any issues unless your application is communicating between the different cores (vpr and cpuapp). Do you use the vpr core in your application at all?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Address issue testing the SMP server sample on the nrf54L15dk</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/516016?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 23:18:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:55a2dd8f-647c-451b-be00-9f7181b008ee</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, I have seen this, and it is present in many of the samples. However, I haven&amp;#39;t encountered any issues because of it. I believe it is just a typo issue in the overlay. I have forwarded your question to our SDK team, and I will let you know when I hear back from them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please note that I will be out of office until January 2nd, and so will most of my colleagues. So please expect some delayed response during this time. I am sorry for the inconvenience. I will get back to you in January.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>