<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Using STMicro BAL-NRF01D3 with QFN</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/1180/using-stmicro-bal-nrf01d3-with-qfn</link><description>I am planning on using the Nordic nRF51822-QFAB-T part. It appears a discrete balun is used for the QFN package on all of the reference designs. Is there a reason that the STMicro BAL-NRF01D3 should not be used in place of the discrete LC network? I only</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:44:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/1180/using-stmicro-bal-nrf01d3-with-qfn" /><item><title>RE: Using STMicro BAL-NRF01D3 with QFN</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/5519?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:44:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9814f04e-d908-4ffd-aba1-e5cde0077179</guid><dc:creator>Vasco Tesi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So with the actual (most recent) NRF51822-QFAA shall we use BALF-NRF01D3 and not BAL-NRF01D3 ?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Using STMicro BAL-NRF01D3 with QFN</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/5518?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5fe82185-da98-4f9c-9755-ff5583393115</guid><dc:creator>RENARD</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will release the BALF-NRF01D3 to work with nRF51822-QFAA build code G0 and nRF51822-QFAB build code B0.
Samples are available and mass production will start week 13.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards
Richard&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Using STMicro BAL-NRF01D3 with QFN</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/5517?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:40:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6a1b2110-d2ee-4905-aebc-8ece14c88751</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The ST balun, BAL-NRF01D3, will work only (world wide) with the build code C or older of the QFN packet. As of today, ST doesn&amp;#39;t have an alternative for build code D. The balun can be used with build code D of Korean teleregulative approval isn&amp;#39;t required.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CSP uses another balun, the BAL-NRF0&lt;strong&gt;2&lt;/strong&gt;D3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the QFN version of the nRF51 series, a discrete balun is the standard solution. But this will not be suitable for the CSP as it&amp;#39;s simply too large. That&amp;#39;s why you&amp;#39;ll find only the discrete balun for the QFN even if there are other options available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>