<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Are IN events on the nrf5340 effectively usable?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/118552/are-in-events-on-the-nrf5340-effectively-usable</link><description>Hi 
 I&amp;#39;d like to use a gpiote in event to trigger a capture task of a timer (rtc timer). Now I realized that according to errata 153 in event may not always work. The suggested workaround is to either use the port event or disable low power mode. Both</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:57:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/118552/are-in-events-on-the-nrf5340-effectively-usable" /><item><title>RE: Are IN events on the nrf5340 effectively usable?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/521261?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:57:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6ff617c2-cccf-47a1-93ec-ab3ee32b484b</guid><dc:creator>bearsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your answer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes I know about the two latency option. I was only talking about the latency register of the gpiote peripheral.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="6207" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/118552/are-in-events-on-the-nrf5340-effectively-usable/521252"] then with a bit of increased power consumption for the GPIOTE IN events with Latency=LowLatency[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;if the application is designed to run at about 30uA, then this is more than just &lt;strong&gt;a bit&lt;/strong&gt;... fortunately I know the time the event is expected to happen and so I can set LowLatency only for that small time window.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Are IN events on the nrf5340 effectively usable?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/521252?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 09:23:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c2015097-6557-4a35-8784-a61fb4407826</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there is a small misunderstanding here. The LATENCY register is only relevant for the GPIOTE peripheral and making the LATENCY=LowPower does not make the whole SoC into high power consumption mode, it only increases the power for GPIOTE peripheral. So yes, if you want to use GPIOTE peripheral for the in events, you can only use it with either PORT events or if you want high accuracy events, then with a bit of increased power consumption for the GPIOTE IN events with Latency=LowLatency. This is a limitation we have now with this chip.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>