<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Can Certification Cost by reduced by disabling the Radio functionality of a Nordic IC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/118896/can-certification-cost-by-reduced-by-disabling-the-radio-functionality-of-a-nordic-ic</link><description>Hello, our entire code base is built around the Nordic SDK. We are considering designing a system that uses an nRF52840 as its controller but has no wireless functionality. 
 
 Can we expect to spend significantly less on certification if we design around</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:28:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/118896/can-certification-cost-by-reduced-by-disabling-the-radio-functionality-of-a-nordic-ic" /><item><title>RE: Can Certification Cost by reduced by disabling the Radio functionality of a Nordic IC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/522895?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:28:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e530608e-b05e-48e1-984c-20ca9e3edb60</guid><dc:creator>ketiljo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#39;re not using the radio, you don&amp;#39;t have to test it. Hence you save a lot of testing. You still have to do EMC or unintentional radiator testing, but that will need to be tested for all kinds of products&amp;nbsp;anyway.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>