<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF9160 COEX interface to nRF52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119712/nrf9160-coex-interface-to-nrf52840</link><description>Hello 
 I am building a hardware that requires to use the nRF9160 together with the nRF52840, in order to add the 2.4GHz radio support to the system and also to be able to perform a remote firmware update on the nRF52840 through the nRF9160. 
 Looking</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:18:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119712/nrf9160-coex-interface-to-nrf52840" /><item><title>RE: nRF9160 COEX interface to nRF52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/527551?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:18:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:01411e38-c7fd-4ea7-aecb-662ea897cd71</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd Hellesvik</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]My question is that, are these COEX pins required to be connected to the nRF52840?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;The Bluetooth LE and the LTE frequencies are very different, so I think there is a good chance that you will be fine without the COEX. The radios will still have an impact on each other, so you have to expect higher package loss than if you had COEX, but I can not tell exactly how large this will be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recommend that you test this with Development Kits to be sure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF9160 COEX interface to nRF52840</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/526991?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:35:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:791ccf40-94f6-45f2-83f3-67b2ec389c4c</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd Hellesvik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;See &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/nwp_037/page/WP/nwp_037/coex_if.html"&gt;nRF9160 design guidelines: COEX&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""] My question is that, are these COEX pins required to be connected to the nRF52840?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;I will look into this.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;span&gt;Also, since I would like to use the 2.4GHZ ESB protocol that can run on the nRF52840, would it be possible with this hardware setup to do such thing?&lt;/span&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;If we for a moment assume that the COEX pins are not required, I see no problem with running ESB on the nRF52840 alongside the nRF9160.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;span&gt;And, finally as I understand it is possible to perform a remote firmware update on the nRF52840, via the nRF9160, using these hardware connections. Is this right?&lt;/span&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes. See &lt;a href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/latest/nrf/samples/cellular/lwm2m_client/fota_external_mcu.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; for a sample.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sigurd Hellesvik&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>