<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52840 SoC+ nRF5 SDK problem</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119949/nrf52840-soc-nrf5-sdk-problem</link><description>Hi all, 
 My team and I are evaluating some BLE modules available on the market. One of them is the UBLOX BMD-340, which contains the nRF52840-QIAA SoC. 
 We are encountering some issues in getting the module to work. As a first step, I simply want to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:04:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119949/nrf52840-soc-nrf5-sdk-problem" /><item><title>RE: nRF52840 SoC+ nRF5 SDK problem</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528058?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:04:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:77793cf1-778e-438c-b106-9092f97a5eb0</guid><dc:creator>GiorgioR</dc:creator><description>&lt;p data-start="65" data-end="156"&gt;I solved the problem and want to share the solution in case it might be useful to others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-start="158" data-end="386"&gt;In my case, the issue was the lack of a low-frequency clock (32.768 kHz). To fix this, I had to change the clock source in sdk_config.h from &lt;code data-start="299" data-end="322"&gt;NRF_CLOCK_LF_SRC_XTAL&lt;/code&gt; to &lt;code data-start="326" data-end="350"&gt;NRF_CLOCK_LF_SRC_SYNTH&lt;/code&gt;. This made the SDK work properly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-start="388" data-end="732"&gt;What seems strange to me, as I mentioned earlier, is that the SDK examples are designed specifically for the development kit. In my opinion, an SDK should primarily be developed for the SoC itself and remain hardware-agnostic. Of course, having additional implementations for specific development kits would still be valuable and appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>