<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to enable 32 MHz for SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002 (to maximize WIFI throughput)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119971/how-to-enable-32-mhz-for-spi4-between-nrf5340-and-nrf7002-to-maximize-wifi-throughput</link><description>Original Title: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002 
 
 We are trying to max out the wifi throughput via nRF7002 when connected to SPI4. Currently we only achieve around 6.3Mbits/sec (TCP Upload to peer). 
 When</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:36:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/119971/how-to-enable-32-mhz-for-spi4-between-nrf5340-and-nrf7002-to-maximize-wifi-throughput" /><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/533190?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:36:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:025f51bd-78aa-44dc-b7a5-cf300224438b</guid><dc:creator>xmoex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Charlie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i saw the mentioned change being incorporated into NCS v.3.0.0. I can confirm that it is now possible to configure SPI4 to 32MHz&amp;nbsp;via &lt;span&gt;app.overlay.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;However, it seems that there is some form of regression in terms of stability and throughput when&amp;nbsp;connected via&amp;nbsp;2.4 GHz. We did some measurements using the NCS v2.9.1 version + 32 MHz SPI4 workaround and there is no noticeable difference between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Both give an average throughput of 8 Mbits/s.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Using the NCS v3.0.0 version (no 32 MHz SPI4 workaround needed) there is a different picture:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;for 5 GHz everything is as expected:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Host:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;$ wifi connect -s########### -k1 -p######## -b5
...
$ zperf tcp upload 192.168.0.202 5001 20 1024
Remote port is 5001
Connecting to 192.168.0.202
Duration:       20.00 s
Packet size:    1024 bytes
Rate:           10 kbps
Starting...
-
Upload completed!
Duration:       20.00 s
Num packets:    18690
Num errors:     0 (retry or fail)
Rate:           7.65 Mbps&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Peer:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;$ iperf -s -i 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  128 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  1] local 192.168.0.202 port 5001 connected with 192.168.0.201 port 61423 (icwnd/mss/irtt=14/1460/6060)
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  1] 0.0000-1.0000 sec   825 KBytes  6.76 Mbits/sec
[  1] 1.0000-2.0000 sec   928 KBytes  7.60 Mbits/sec
[  1] 2.0000-3.0000 sec   952 KBytes  7.80 Mbits/sec
[  1] 3.0000-4.0000 sec   930 KBytes  7.62 Mbits/sec
[  1] 4.0000-5.0000 sec   947 KBytes  7.76 Mbits/sec
[  1] 5.0000-6.0000 sec   942 KBytes  7.72 Mbits/sec
[  1] 6.0000-7.0000 sec   941 KBytes  7.71 Mbits/sec
[  1] 7.0000-8.0000 sec   941 KBytes  7.71 Mbits/sec
[  1] 8.0000-9.0000 sec   935 KBytes  7.66 Mbits/sec
[  1] 9.0000-10.0000 sec   948 KBytes  7.77 Mbits/sec
[  1] 10.0000-11.0000 sec   941 KBytes  7.71 Mbits/sec
[  1] 11.0000-12.0000 sec   932 KBytes  7.64 Mbits/sec
[  1] 12.0000-13.0000 sec   931 KBytes  7.63 Mbits/sec
[  1] 13.0000-14.0000 sec   922 KBytes  7.56 Mbits/sec
[  1] 14.0000-15.0000 sec   930 KBytes  7.62 Mbits/sec
[  1] 15.0000-16.0000 sec   917 KBytes  7.51 Mbits/sec
[  1] 16.0000-17.0000 sec   927 KBytes  7.59 Mbits/sec
[  1] 17.0000-18.0000 sec   915 KBytes  7.50 Mbits/sec
[  1] 18.0000-19.0000 sec   928 KBytes  7.60 Mbits/sec
[  1] 19.0000-20.0000 sec   934 KBytes  7.65 Mbits/sec
[  1] 0.0000-20.0130 sec  18.1 MBytes  7.60 Mbits/sec&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;for 2.4 GHz the throughput is less than satisfactory:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Host:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;$ wifi connect -s########### -k1 -p######## -b2
...
$ zperf tcp upload 192.168.0.202 5001 20 1024
Remote port is 5001
Connecting to 192.168.0.202
Duration:       20.00 s
Packet size:    1024 bytes
Rate:           10 kbps
Starting...
-
Upload completed!
Duration:       20.00 s
Num packets:    4817
Num errors:     0 (retry or fail)
Rate:           1.97 Mbps&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Peer:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;$ iperf -s -i 1
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  128 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  1] local 192.168.0.202 port 5001 connected with 192.168.0.201 port 40620 (icwnd/mss/irtt=14/1460/14986)
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  1] 0.0000-1.0000 sec   159 KBytes  1.30 Mbits/sec
[  1] 1.0000-2.0000 sec   322 KBytes  2.64 Mbits/sec
[  1] 2.0000-3.0000 sec   331 KBytes  2.71 Mbits/sec
[  1] 3.0000-4.0000 sec   289 KBytes  2.37 Mbits/sec
[  1] 4.0000-5.0000 sec   312 KBytes  2.56 Mbits/sec
[  1] 5.0000-6.0000 sec   305 KBytes  2.50 Mbits/sec
[  1] 6.0000-7.0000 sec   354 KBytes  2.90 Mbits/sec
[  1] 7.0000-8.0000 sec   305 KBytes  2.50 Mbits/sec
[  1] 8.0000-9.0000 sec  44.2 KBytes   362 Kbits/sec
[  1] 9.0000-10.0000 sec   286 KBytes  2.34 Mbits/sec
[  1] 10.0000-11.0000 sec   361 KBytes  2.96 Mbits/sec
[  1] 11.0000-12.0000 sec   374 KBytes  3.06 Mbits/sec
[  1] 12.0000-13.0000 sec   368 KBytes  3.01 Mbits/sec
[  1] 13.0000-14.0000 sec   141 KBytes  1.16 Mbits/sec
[  1] 14.0000-15.0000 sec  2.85 KBytes  23.4 Kbits/sec
[  1] 15.0000-16.0000 sec   143 KBytes  1.17 Mbits/sec
[  1] 16.0000-17.0000 sec  87.4 KBytes   716 Kbits/sec
[  1] 17.0000-18.0000 sec  4.28 KBytes  35.0 Kbits/sec
[  1] 18.0000-19.0000 sec   278 KBytes  2.28 Mbits/sec
[  1] 19.0000-20.0000 sec   348 KBytes  2.85 Mbits/sec
[  1] 0.0000-20.0240 sec  4.70 MBytes  1.97 Mbits/sec&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Looking&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;the oscilloscope it seems that&amp;nbsp;on multiple occasions during the stream the clock signal disappears and the reappears for short intervals.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Do you have an opinion about that? Or do you need further information about our setup? Is there any way we can get more information about what happens when the data rate is reduced so much?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Just doing a quick check&amp;nbsp;using&amp;nbsp;SPI4 at 16 MHz&amp;nbsp;we can also see the regression:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;- 6 Mbit/s for 5 GHz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;- 2.6 Mbits/ for 2.4 GHz with short periods of clock signal loss&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update2:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;Same with SPI4 at 8 MHz:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;- 4.1 Mbits/s for 5 GHz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:line-through;"&gt;- 2.7 Mbits/s for 2.4 GHz&amp;nbsp;with short periods of clock signal loss&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update3:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Testing the device using a different router everything works as expected. It seems that the 2.4 GHz / 5 GHz throuput difference has to do mostly with the router, so this investigation was basically a dead end...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/529561?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:18:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b58f7c07-f833-4e7f-8d47-67c284f8a8ce</guid><dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Moritz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing your new solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The corncern seems to be solved&amp;nbsp;here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/87706"&gt;nrf70: Implement SPI clock switching by krish2718 · Pull Request #87706 · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We plan to include&amp;nbsp;this fix&amp;nbsp;with the coming release NCS v3.0.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/529330?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:28:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b1a86381-06f2-4386-a099-6b9405e3e063</guid><dc:creator>xmoex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Charlie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found a way boost the SPI4 frequency to 32Mhz without hacking. I can use&amp;nbsp;&lt;a id="" href="https://docs.zephyrproject.org/apidoc/latest/group__sys__init.html"&gt;https://docs.zephyrproject.org/apidoc/latest/group__sys__init.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to set the system clock to 128Mhz before SPIM4 is configured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="diff"&gt;diff --git a/src/main.c b/src/main.c
index 231f206..5d2db35 100644
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -15,14 +15,20 @@
 #endif
 #include &amp;lt;stdio.h&amp;gt;
 
-int main(void)
-{
 #if NRFX_CLOCK_ENABLED &amp;amp;&amp;amp; (defined(CLOCK_FEATURE_HFCLK_DIVIDE_PRESENT) || NRF_CLOCK_HAS_HFCLK192M)
+static int clock_set_128Mhz(void)
+{
        /* For now hardcode to 128MHz */
-       nrfx_clock_divider_set(NRF_CLOCK_DOMAIN_HFCLK,
-                              NRF_CLOCK_HFCLK_DIV_1);
+       nrfx_clock_divider_set(NRF_CLOCK_DOMAIN_HFCLK, NRF_CLOCK_HFCLK_DIV_1);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+SYS_INIT(clock_set_128Mhz, POST_KERNEL, CONFIG_KERNEL_INIT_PRIORITY_DEFAULT);
 #endif
-       printk(&amp;quot;Starting %s with CPU frequency: %d MHz\n&amp;quot;, CONFIG_BOARD, SystemCoreClock/MHZ(1));
+
+int main(void)
+{
+       printk(&amp;quot;Starting %s with CPU frequency: %d MHz\n&amp;quot;, CONFIG_BOARD, SystemCoreClock / MHZ(1));
 
        return 0;
 }
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I consider this however just a workaround.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did not understand the connection&amp;nbsp;to the ticket you linked, am I missing something?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically I&amp;#39;m interested as to why &amp;quot;32Mhz is not a safe choice at current moment&amp;quot;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;will it be in the future?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;besides from difficulties in setting it up, are there known problems further down the road?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moritz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/529090?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:10:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:17632385-6f9f-46f7-aea2-03d8ea3bdac9</guid><dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Moritz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for sharing your finding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;32MHz is not a safe choice at current moment, you may encounter an issue mentioned here&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/support-private/support/342633"&gt;(+) Nordic DevZone&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528631?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:26:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3b4ff711-ce93-4682-952b-ff777a732aec</guid><dc:creator>xmoex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Charlie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks for looking into the problem!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When forcing a reconfiguration from main.c after the clock has been successfully set to 128Mhz we are&amp;nbsp;able to see 32Mhz on the SPI4 CLK via oscilloscope as well as observing 7.78 Mbps throughput. The modification to spi_nrfx_spim.c look like the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="diff"&gt;diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_nrfx_spim.c b/drivers/spi/spi_nrfx_spim.c
index aacf863e3b4..9b0c8b2a2d6 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi_nrfx_spim.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi_nrfx_spim.c
@@ -157,9 +157,16 @@ static int configure(const struct device *dev,
        nrfx_spim_config_t config;
        nrfx_err_t result;
 
-       if (dev_data-&amp;gt;initialized &amp;amp;&amp;amp; spi_context_configured(ctx, spi_cfg)) {
-               /* Already configured. No need to do it again. */
-               return 0;
+       extern bool UGLY_FORCE_RECONFIGURE_SPIM;
+
+       if (!UGLY_FORCE_RECONFIGURE_SPIM) {
+               if (dev_data-&amp;gt;initialized &amp;amp;&amp;amp; spi_context_configured(ctx, spi_cfg)) {
+                       /* Already configured. No need to do it again. */
+                       return 0;
+               }
+       } else {
+               LOG_ERR(&amp;quot;Reconfiguring SPIM %s&amp;quot;, dev-&amp;gt;name);
+               UGLY_FORCE_RECONFIGURE_SPIM = false;
        }
 
        if (spi_cfg-&amp;gt;operation &amp;amp; SPI_HALF_DUPLEX) {&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From our point of view it looks like the SPI4 is configured before entering `main()` so spi_nrfx_spim.c:160-163&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="c_cpp"&gt;if (dev_data-&amp;gt;initialized &amp;amp;&amp;amp; spi_context_configured(ctx, spi_cfg)) {
	/* Already configured. No need to do it again. */
	return 0;
}&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;always leads to an early exit, even though the clock might have been reconfigured&amp;nbsp;after SPIM4&amp;#39;s initial initialization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hope this helps,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moritz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528442?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:29:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ba39e504-eb51-41d1-ade8-5b314ae3fb99</guid><dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Moritz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I observed the same results as you. I suspect this could be due to long wiring causing the SPI timing requirements to not be met.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have had customers successfully use SPI4 at 32MHz on their custom boards before. I will spend more time investigating this next week and update you accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt; Charlie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528266?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:14:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8f5eb3a2-701b-4dbe-9fa6-e86a42223cc1</guid><dc:creator>xmoex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Charlie,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we are running at 128Mhz:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;SystemCoreClock / MHZ(1) = 128&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528260?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:54:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:afd90e38-7751-4a27-b24b-cb1ef3212ed3</guid><dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Moritz,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reaching out with your questions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I recall that it is also critical to use a 128MHz system clock to make SPI4 work with 32MHz. Could you confirm if you have made this change?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jørgen is currently unavailable. I will try this myself tomorrow to see if it is possible and get back to you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Charlie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to maximize WIFI throughput when using SPI4 between nRF5340 and nRF7002</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/528257?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:39:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8fd8c3e5-da6f-4a48-9c8c-2a240562a0bd</guid><dc:creator>xmoex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/joh2"&gt;Jørgen Holmefjord&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I saw you gave some hints about using SPI4 at 32Mhz, can you look into this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/108868/spi4-with-multiple-cs"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../spi4-with-multiple-cs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>