<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>channel sounding distance estimation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/120182/channel-sounding-distance-estimation</link><description>Dear Support Team, 
 I am currently working with two nRF54L15 DK boards placed approximately 50 cm apart and stationary. I am using the channel_sounding_ras_ example with SDK v2.9.1 to evaluate channel sounding precision. 
 However, I am encountering</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 06:56:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/120182/channel-sounding-distance-estimation" /><item><title>RE: channel sounding distance estimation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/540097?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2025 06:56:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:56dab041-b1b0-49a5-a46f-9d8bd27d5aba</guid><dc:creator>witc</dc:creator><description>&lt;p data-start="61" data-end="207"&gt;I used the RAS example in SDK 3.0.1 and my results are:&lt;br data-start="117" data-end="120" /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;ifft: 1.234041, phase_slope: 1.854832, rtt: 8.811189&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br data-start="172" data-end="175" /&gt; (real distance is 0.8 m, indoor)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-start="85" data-end="355"&gt;As users, can we only try to improve the result of each of these three methods by changing different parameters and testing? Is that what you mean? Or will there also be some improvements in the SDK libraries, so that we get better results even with the same parameters?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-start="357" data-end="487"&gt;Can we expect some improvements in the next SDK version? For example, will there be a way to combine these three results into one?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p data-start="406" data-end="462"&gt;Can we expect any improvement from Nordic in the future?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you, Jan.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: channel sounding distance estimation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/529329?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:23:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4d9d65bf-f10f-4c19-935e-694d79898d71</guid><dc:creator>maxime@conduent</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maxime&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: channel sounding distance estimation</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/529247?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 09:52:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:eed27345-b03f-4f0c-a322-ef7d8826e1cd</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m sorry, but the Channel sounding is still very much in experimental mode yet, and&amp;nbsp;the ranging algorithms are very basic, so very accurate ranging can&amp;#39;t be expected at this point. We will have better versions coming, but in the end the algorithm for ranging is up to you to improve as it will be outside of what we support in the SDK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>