<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to reach maximum BLE throughput at 2M PHY with nRF5340DK (peripheral) and nRF52 Dongle (central)?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/121341/how-to-reach-maximum-ble-throughput-at-2m-phy-with-nrf5340dk-peripheral-and-nrf52-dongle-central</link><description>Hi everyone, 
 I&amp;#39;m developing a BLE application where I measure throughput between an nRF5340DK acting as peripheral and an nRF52 Dongle as the central (using a Python script with Blatann on PC), and I’m trying to understand how to maximize the notification</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 09:24:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/121341/how-to-reach-maximum-ble-throughput-at-2m-phy-with-nrf5340dk-peripheral-and-nrf52-dongle-central" /><item><title>RE: How to reach maximum BLE throughput at 2M PHY with nRF5340DK (peripheral) and nRF52 Dongle (central)?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/536367?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 09:24:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d1dafc39-cead-49d7-8d49-f3607e4f5c73</guid><dc:creator>Jakob Ruhe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You should indeed be able to reach higher throughput over 2 Mbit Bluetooth. Have a look at the Throughput sample application:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/samples/bluetooth/throughput/README.html"&gt;Bluetooth: Throughput&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for inspiration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I used it with 2 Mbit some time ago I got the following results between two nRF52840-DK close to each other:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;==== Starting throughput test ====
PHY update pending
LE PHY updated: TX PHY LE 2M, RX PHY LE 2M
Connection parameters update pending
Connection parameters updated.
 interval: 320, latency: 0, timeout: 1000
LE Data length update pending
LE data len updated: TX (len: 251 time: 2120) RX (len: 251 time: 2120)
The test is in progress and will require around 20 seconds to complete.
                                                                           
Done
[local] sent 3434805 bytes (3354 KB) in 20001 ms at 1373 kbps
[peer] received 3434805 bytes (3354 KB) in 6939 GATT writes at 1391672 bps
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1373 kbps is indeed higher than 54 kbps. Note that I used a higher Connection Interval than you. Have a look at&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/92683/increasing-ble-throughput"&gt;Increasing BLE Throughput - Nordic Q&amp;amp;A - Nordic DevZone - Nordic DevZone&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to which role the Connection Interval plays.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To verify that you are using 2 Mbit you can use the function `bt_conn_get_info()`. Or you can use a Bluetooth sniffer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know nothing about Blatann and I have never tried running the Host on the PC. Are they communicating over serial? At which speed? I think such a setup also can introduce latencies. If you are using an UART at 115 kbps that will introduce a bottleneck for the Bluetooth communication link.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>