https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/122027/nrf54l-lfxo-and-lflprcwe don&#39;t seem to have power numbers for the 54L, but in the 5340 datasheet it shows the LFXO (0.16uA) used less power then the LFRC (1 uA). Is that true with the NRF54L with the LFXO and the LFLPRC? and if so, do we know if the power numbers we showen-USTelligent Community 13Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:03:07 GMThttps://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/538100?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:03:07 GMT137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3d9da481-6b7f-4a19-80b9-b844173f4a86Hieu<p>Hi Wes,</p> <p>LFXO run current is lower LFRC. It also brings a few benefit that saves even more current:</p> <p>- No need for the periodic LFRC recalibration</p> <p>- Shorter RX windows thanks to higher LFCLK accuracy</p> <p>As for listed numbers, I see that the datasheet only lists no LFCLK or LFXO:<br /><a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf54L15/page/chapters/current_consumption/doc/current_consumption.html">https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf54L15/page/chapters/current_consumption/doc/current_consumption.html</a></p> <p>Hieu</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>