<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Use nRF54L15DK PCA10156 to test Bluetooth Channel Sounding</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/122154/use-nrf54l15dk-pca10156-to-test-bluetooth-channel-sounding</link><description>I&amp;#39;m use latest ncs source code and nRF54L15DK PCA10156 to test Bluetooth Channel Sounding, but i&amp;#39;m find the result not very accurate, and also echo such like warnings: 
 
 ter. (peer: 3329, local: 3330) [2025-06-10 14:39:21.176] W: Mismatch of local and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:21:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/122154/use-nrf54l15dk-pca10156-to-test-bluetooth-channel-sounding" /><item><title>RE: Use nRF54L15DK PCA10156 to test Bluetooth Channel Sounding</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/538630?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:21:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9e117b07-2d9f-4c2d-b52a-8cf265c45fa9</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am sorry to hear that. So you are using the latest tagged version of the nordic samples (ie. &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/samples/bluetooth/channel_sounding_ras_reflector/README.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/samples/bluetooth/channel_sounding_ras_initiator/README.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, don&amp;#39;t confuse them with the one directly from &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/zephyr/samples/bluetooth/channel_sounding/README.html#ble_cs"&gt;Zephyr&lt;/a&gt;)? Or are you using the main branch?&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]accurate[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to accuracy it is worth noting that these samples aren&amp;#39;t made to demonstrate the best accuracy you can find, but how to get eg. the I/Q values from which you can get the distance. You could always create your own algorithm for the rest, or purchase a third party one. Though with that said, how bad is it? I would recommend looking at IFFT for shorter distances and RTT for longer ones.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you wonder about what sort of accuracy you should be able to achieve with BT Channel Sounding I would recommend having a look at this &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/5vZIILTWmW0?si=nd2eKIkP_lfB5xG3&amp;amp;t=1230"&gt;older webinar for the nordic distance toolbox&lt;/a&gt; (which is a proprietary older solution we have available for nRF52/53). It is based on a bit of the same technology as channel sounding, so the results should be similar but a bit better for channel sounding.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]and also echo such like warnings:[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Are these default unmodified samples? It looks to me as if one of them has modified its step mode, and there is a certain mismatch there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elfving&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>