how to use -fomit-frame-pointer for one file only

RE: how to use -fomit-frame-pointer for one file only

seanbites — Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:48:55 GMT

I am running sdk9.2 and version 5.2 2015q4 of gnu tools. I do not get the error if I omit the frame pointers, which seems to work fine for now. Thank you very much for the above explanation and link, if I encounter any debugging issues, I'll definitely refer to this!

RE: how to use -fomit-frame-pointer for one file only

Håkon Alseth — Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:35:59 GMT

Hi,

If you use any optimization except -O0, -fomit-frame-pointer will be used:

-fomit-frame-pointer

Don't keep the frame pointer in a register for functions that don't need one. This avoids the instructions to save, set up and restore frame pointers; it also makes an extra register available in many functions. It also makes debugging impossible on some machines. On some machines, such as the VAX, this flag has no effect, because the standard calling sequence automatically handles the frame pointer and nothing is saved by pretending it doesn't exist. The machine-description macro FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED controls whether a target machine supports this flag. See Register Usage.

Enabled at levels -O, -O2, -O3, -Os.

You can use pragma:

#pragma GCC push_options
#pragma GCC optimize ("O0")

ret = do_something();

#pragma GCC pop_options

or if you want to set it on the specific function:

int some_func(void) __attribute__((optimize("-O0")));

This error is not shown on my end (arm-none-eabi v4.9.3, SDK 10), I even tested with lto set as well.

What SDK version are you using? And which version of arm-none-eabi are you using?

Cheers, Håkon

RE: how to use -fomit-frame-pointer for one file only

seanbites — Sun, 06 Mar 2016 16:04:44 GMT

Say that I were compelled to do it anyways (I believe this is something that is useful to know), how would I go about doing this?

RE: how to use -fomit-frame-pointer for one file only

RK — Sun, 06 Mar 2016 00:40:06 GMT

it's easier just to remove the r7 from that line, it's not really needed anyway