<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF21540 with no load</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/124755/nrf21540-with-no-load</link><description>Hi 
 Is there a specification of running the nRF21540 in Tx mode at 10 dBm and 20 dBm with no load connected? Will the reflected signal cause damage to the PA and if yes, do you have a suggestion to protect the chip against it? 
 Background: We develop</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:30:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/124755/nrf21540-with-no-load" /><item><title>RE: nRF21540 with no load</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/551487?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 17:30:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e2558596-29e8-4a84-a3ae-5a395737efaf</guid><dc:creator>Hieu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rashid,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I double checked with my colleague, and it&amp;#39;s not just RX sensitivity, but both TX and RX performance need to be compromised, by adding an&amp;nbsp;attenuator between the FEM and the antenna. I must stress that this is not a good solution though, as it is just wasting power/.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hieu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF21540 with no load</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/551162?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 17:16:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47bd969c-7be7-47aa-855d-e6c7795ba44b</guid><dc:creator>Rashid Talib</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Hieu&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your reply. If RX sensitivity could be compromised, what solutions would you suggest?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Rashid&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF21540 with no load</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/551045?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 21:41:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:aa4eae9a-d99b-4055-95fb-a521b43fb1f0</guid><dc:creator>Hieu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rashid,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After some internal inquiries,&amp;nbsp;we concluded that there is risk of damaging the FEM if it is run unloaded for an extended period of time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is unfortunately no way to&amp;nbsp;protect&amp;nbsp;against this without sacrificing RX sensitivity.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it&amp;#39;s best to make sufficiently clear warning against this misuse?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hieu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF21540 with no load</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/550591?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:52:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c2a1acde-6273-411a-92ae-0f9818745465</guid><dc:creator>Hieu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Rashid,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will look into this and follow-up with you next week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hieu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>