<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>About analyzing the results measured with DTM and RSSI Viewer.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125177/about-analyzing-the-results-measured-with-dtm-and-rssi-viewer</link><description>HI 
 We are currently manufacturing products using the nRF52832, but some receiver sensitivity issues have been reported and are currently under review. 
 
 1) Inspection methods during production 
 - Since we don&amp;#39;t have specialized RF equipment, we build</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:00:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125177/about-analyzing-the-results-measured-with-dtm-and-rssi-viewer" /><item><title>RE: About analyzing the results measured with DTM and RSSI Viewer.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/552249?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:00:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7a71d6a8-9b33-4638-89aa-2b7a6bb87b3b</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Radiated measurements will be attenuated based on distance. You should measure conducted with specific equipment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order to evaluate RF PHY, you need to use specific equipment (spectrum analyzer) for this, as the RSSI is only valid between -20 to -90 dBm:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf52832/page/radio.html#d939e37486"&gt;https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf52832/page/radio.html#d939e37486&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I strongly suggest that you create a private case, and ask for a design review.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: About analyzing the results measured with DTM and RSSI Viewer.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/552245?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:56:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d5b2504-36a3-4359-ae26-cbd8f68eea4e</guid><dc:creator>Turbo J</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no reason for the receiver to support high signal levels, thus I assume that -35dB is just its maxed output value. Your setup &amp;quot;screams its ears off&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Try with a more sensible attenuator like 40 or 50 dB. Remember that BTLE receiver circuits are rather sensitive, these can &amp;quot;hear grass grow&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No idea whether you can just daisy-chain attenuators, I&amp;#39;m not a HF guy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>