RE: Little compilation mistakes in new SDK 11

Marius Heil — Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:11:55 GMT

Any chance that the listed errors are resolved very soon? I find it very inconveniant to edit the SDK files, especially for open source projects that are used by other people.

RE: Little compilation mistakes in new SDK 11

Susheel Nuguru — Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:36:04 GMT

The radio notification issue is covered here

RE: Little compilation mistakes in new SDK 11

Susheel Nuguru — Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:16:52 GMT

Thanks for reporting this Fabien, I will create a case for this. I will also find out why these modules were release without even been able to compile them.

in ble_radio_notification.h add typedef uint8_t nrf_radio_notification_distance_t;

in ble_radio_notification.c add #include "nrf_nvic.h" => because sd_nvic_xxx functions are moved and no longer SVC calls.

The ASSERT is only valid when you define either DEBUG_NRF or DEBUG_NRF_USER (please check nrf_asser.h file) If you define it then I agree that your suggestion needs to applied.

in nrf_drv_spi, line 519

ASSERT(p_tx_buffer != NULL || tx_buffer_length == 0); 
ASSERT(p_rx_buffer != NULL || rx_buffer_length == 0);
=>
 ASSERT(p_xfer_desc->p_tx_buffer != NULL || p_xfer_desc->tx_length == 0);
 ASSERT(p_xfer_desc->p_rx_buffer != NULL || p_xfer_desc->rx_length == 0);