<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Minimizing ESB latency on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125879/minimizing-esb-latency-on-nrf54l15</link><description>Hi, I’m currently experimenting with ESB using the standard esv_ptx/esb_prx examples on two nRF54L15 DK. My goal is to reduce the radio latency as much as possible. I&amp;#39;m still quite new to nordic devices. 
 I added some timing code using k_cycle_get_32</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:34:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125879/minimizing-esb-latency-on-nrf54l15" /><item><title>RE: Minimizing ESB latency on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/555698?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:34:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e0faff5d-7bae-4e13-b014-3a53b25c6535</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With nRF52-series and newer, you can set:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;pre class="ui-code" data-mode="text"&gt;config.use_fast_ramp_up = true;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;without having&amp;nbsp;CONFIG_ESB_FAST_SWITCHING enabled/set. Fast switching is a even reduced timing when doing turn-around (TX-&amp;gt;RX or RX-&amp;gt;TX) on nRF54-series devices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see that this is guarded in the samples at this time:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrf/blob/main/samples/esb/esb_ptx/src/main.c#L167-L169"&gt;https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrf/blob/main/samples/esb/esb_ptx/src/main.c#L167-L169&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this lacks a proper comment on why, which I will bring up internally with the ESB team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>