<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Coded PHY throughput</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125930/coded-phy-throughput</link><description>Where can I find expected throughput for coded PHY in real life? The bitrate for S2 is 500 kbps because there are two symbols per bit in respect to 1M PHY. As part of a packet is coded with slower S8, and taking into account protocol overhead and noise</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 15:25:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/125930/coded-phy-throughput" /><item><title>RE: Coded PHY throughput</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/556267?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 15:25:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:67c1fc50-8df7-4857-84ca-1a873872ecc6</guid><dc:creator>grzegorz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I understand why it was decided this way. I just want to know if 27 byte PDU is the reason of low throughput or there is something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Coded PHY throughput</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/556256?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:30:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0f210c08-ef8f-4907-b7cb-71c68dd0dc7c</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Because&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;longer Link Layer packets on CODED PHY would&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;increase problems with interference and therefore have a negative impact on the effective range.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Coded PHY throughput</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/556187?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 22:36:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ffcbdfdc-e899-45ad-80c3-2ddc47b0bcb3</guid><dc:creator>grzegorz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reply but I don&amp;#39;t see answer to my problem in that post. However I found out that for Coded PHY Nordic supports LL PDU up to just 27 bytes (limitation&amp;nbsp;DRGN-8476). Is it the reason for low throughput on Coded PHY? During further testing I was changing DLE setting and noticed no impact at all. This is a hint that with small PDU the DLE can&amp;#39;t provide any advantage because packets are small anyway, they just seem bigger on upper BLE layer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Coded PHY throughput</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/556056?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 21:29:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:902b424c-d3d1-487c-b4ad-dd201163589b</guid><dc:creator>Amanda Hsieh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Check out &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/100850/connection-event-length-problem-with-coded-phy/431441"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Amanda H.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>