<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>S110 on SDK11</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/12597/s110-on-sdk11</link><description>I noticed S110 is not listed as supported by nRF5 SDK11. However, no supported SoftDevice seems to offer the same functionality as the S110 (Peripheral only protocol stack). Is it necessary to use a broader SoftDevice?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:25:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/12597/s110-on-sdk11" /><item><title>RE: S110 on SDK11</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/47826?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:25:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2b3a36f3-88c7-4ff9-a961-47482715aa6d</guid><dc:creator>RK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can configure the S130 to have just peripheral connections to get it to use as little memory as possible, in that state it uses a little more flash and no more, possibly less, RAM than the S110.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given that all the new development work is going to the S130 and S132, it&amp;#39;s really worth moving on from the S110 and getting all the new stuff which is already there and the benefit of anything else new which will come in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>