<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Coexistence of Thread/Matter  (SSED) and BLE (PAwR) on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126570/coexistence-of-thread-matter-ssed-and-ble-pawr-on-nrf54l15</link><description>I am developing a proof-of-concept for remote controlled super-low-power devices using PAwR. I started with nRF52840 (for boths, clients and remote) and now migrated my code the newer nRF54L15 Platform (using holyiot24005 Modules). All worked fine and</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:25:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126570/coexistence-of-thread-matter-ssed-and-ble-pawr-on-nrf54l15" /><item><title>RE: Coexistence of Thread/Matter  (SSED) and BLE (PAwR) on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/560917?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 13:25:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7dc3ddc2-09c3-4242-ac79-8b1be526823b</guid><dc:creator>SwRa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Gilbert,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just confirmed with the team.. It should work. BLE &lt;span&gt;always has priority and occupies the radio when there is some BLE event, and Thread/15.4 takes whatever is left. So it is advised to make sure not to spend too much time on the radio on BLE.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could you provide some information on the radio pattern on BLE (like how long the packets are, how frequent etc.)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Swathy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Coexistence of Thread/Matter  (SSED) and BLE (PAwR) on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/559509?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 18:29:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cf93bb15-f4e2-41e4-b64d-534f61aaee2d</guid><dc:creator>Gilbert_J</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks so far - would be great&amp;nbsp;if you could get any additional information.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Gilbert&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Coexistence of Thread/Matter  (SSED) and BLE (PAwR) on nRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/559471?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 13:41:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cdebcacf-c772-458f-8a1e-3a65239d98a3</guid><dc:creator>SwRa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Gilbert,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your assumptions are more or less correct..&amp;nbsp;nRF54L15 can run Matter over Thread and BLE concurrently on a single SoC&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;using the multiprotocol (System‑on‑Chip) design. Refer:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/protocols/matter/overview/integration.html#matter_platform_designs_system-on-chip_multiprotocol"&gt;https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/protocols/matter/overview/integration.html#matter_platform_designs_system-on-chip_multiprotocol&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;The&amp;nbsp;radio time‑sharing is handled by the Multiprotocol Service Layer (MPSL).&amp;nbsp;There have been discussions regarding this on Devzone, like this one:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/116722/is-it-possible-that-running-matter_light-and-ble-peripheral_uart-at-the-same-time"&gt;Is it possible that running Matter_light and BLE peripheral_uart at the same time?&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I am not sure about &amp;nbsp;PAwR‑specific coexistence&amp;nbsp;though.. I will have to check this internally and get back to you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Swathy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>