<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FEM simple GPIO configuration</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126775/fem-simple-gpio-configuration</link><description>Hi devzone team I&amp;#39;m working on the nRF54L05 with the FEM RFX2401C from Skyworks. I&amp;#39;m trying to configure the FEM with the &amp;quot;Simple GPIO&amp;quot; option. Here my overlay file: 
 After a successful build and flashing, I see this error message on the console all</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:32:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126775/fem-simple-gpio-configuration" /><item><title>RE: FEM simple GPIO configuration</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/560258?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 16:32:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:da6c54b8-6e6b-454e-b448-e2bcdb2319df</guid><dc:creator>Gerardo Valdovinos</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Elfving&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for you suggestion. I updated the Nordic SDK from v3.0.2 to v3.2.1 and now the FEM is working in GPIO mode. I verified it seeing the RSSI from -80dBm to -10dBm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FEM simple GPIO configuration</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/560005?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:44:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:edc8f35b-22c0-4f5c-bc57-9fb74ca23275</guid><dc:creator>Elfving</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Thanks in advance and I&amp;#39;m sorry for asking a lot of questions.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;First of all, this is no problem at all &lt;span class="emoticon" data-url="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/emoji/1f642.svg" title="Slight smile"&gt;&amp;#x1f642;&lt;/span&gt; Just blast us with questions! That is what we are here for.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Is it true that nRF54L05 doesn&amp;#39;t support FEM?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;is there a plan to add FEM support on nRF54L05 in the future?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;I believe that is a bug/oversight in the documentation, I am not getting why it shouldn&amp;#39;t be supported. What NCS version are you using though? &lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrfxlib/mpsl/CHANGELOG.html#nrf_connect_sdk_v310"&gt;Just noticed that there were some additions in 3.1&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Questions 3.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Is it true that channel sounding cannot be used with a FEM?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Can you suggest an option to reach that range without using a FEM?&lt;/span&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;True: you can not use channel sounding with a FEM, due to it being very dependant on the timing, and the FEM adding another layer that throws that timing off. But&amp;nbsp;for those sorts of distances you would either way only be able to use the RTT part of channel sounding, which I guess would also be technically be possible for you to implemement yourself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that 100m is rather far. &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/testing-max-range-with-ble-with-nrf21540dks-and-nrf52840-dks"&gt;A coworker of mine was able to reach 4700 meters with a FEM&lt;/a&gt;, but it is hard to give a clear yes/no answer to this, since it also depends on the environment, with its rf-noise and whether or not its a clear line of sight etc. 100m can be possible, but I would recommend you to try it out in the environment you have in mind.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Questions 4.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Can we use coded PHY for range and channel sounding for distance, without FEM?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:rgba(51, 102, 255, 1);"&gt;Can we use coded PHY for range and Bluetooth mesh together with algorithms for distance, without FEM?&lt;/span&gt;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Channel sounding excludes both FEM and coded phy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am a bit uncertain about what you mean in your other question here. BLE mesh requires&amp;nbsp;1M PHY (for it to follow the spec atleast), but you can let your nodes both be in a Mesh network and have a BLE connection, and let the latter use coded. Mesh can also use FEM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards, and have a good week-end&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elfving&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>