<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Migration Guidance: Implementing TinyCrypt-equivalent functionality in NCS v3.2.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126828/migration-guidance-implementing-tinycrypt-equivalent-functionality-in-ncs-v3-2-1</link><description>Hello DevZone Team, 
 I would like to express my appreciation for the excellent support and the collaborative community platform you provide for nRF developers. 
 We are currently in the process of migrating our project from nRF Connect SDK (NCS) v3.0</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 14:13:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126828/migration-guidance-implementing-tinycrypt-equivalent-functionality-in-ncs-v3-2-1" /><item><title>RE: Migration Guidance: Implementing TinyCrypt-equivalent functionality in NCS v3.2.1</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/560240?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 14:13:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5f87b163-f55a-4e48-8ac1-2cb889a81745</guid><dc:creator>Edvin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is correct that TinyCrypt is being deprecated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there any particular reason why you are porting this application to v3.2.1? The reason I ask is that there are many changes in the latest SDK updates, but they don&amp;#39;t bring any new features to the nRF52 series. My recommandation is that if your application is dependent on TinyCrypt, you should stay on v3.0.2, if that works for your application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But please let me know if you have a particular reason to move to v3.2.1. It would be useful to know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Edvin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>