<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Question about the Host IC selection.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126981/question-about-the-host-ic-selection</link><description>Hi. I have a question about the selection of Host IC of nRF7002. 
 
 Looks like general official recommendation is nRF5340. 
 But my team has a long history with nRF52840. (Which means we have a plenty stock in our warehouse.) 
 
 # Question 
 With nRF52840</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:46:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/126981/question-about-the-host-ic-selection" /><item><title>RE: Question about the Host IC selection.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/561009?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 12:46:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f674bb2a-c0ab-46a7-a9ca-ea6efbd1a5b8</guid><dc:creator>SwRa</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is not recommended to use an nRF52840&amp;nbsp;as a host for nRF7002 in your use case&lt;span&gt;. As you can see in this page:&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/nrf70/constrained.html"&gt;https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/app_dev/device_guides/nrf70/constrained.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, the nRF52840 is marked as supported, but with a commend that &amp;quot;the SoC is supported, but the use case is not recommended due to performance or memory constraints.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;It should be t&lt;/span&gt;echnically possible to bring up Wi‑Fi (scan only)+ some BLE if you are extremely aggressive with optimization and feature trade‑offs, but again it is not recommended. F&lt;span&gt;or your full feature set (Wi‑Fi HTTP, multi‑central BLE, LCD, dual‑OTA, sensors),&amp;nbsp;it definitely will not be enough. I suggest that you look at nRF5340 since it is fully supported.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Swathy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>