Why can't TF-M RAM partition on NRF9151 be smaller than 32KB?

RE: Why can't TF-M RAM partition on NRF9151 be smaller than 32KB?

Hieu — Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:14:59 GMT

Hi Regan0,

Thank you for your patience.

After discussing with some colleagues, I reached the conclusion that as TF-M, at least in the minimal profile, doesn't use dynamic memory allocation. Therefore, it should not use more RAM than reported in the build log.

Thus, you can reduce the RAM size. The only concern would be for the memory alignment requirement, which 16kB would satisfy for the nRF9151.

On another note, a colleague also pointed out that the application can override the Kconfig definition in its own Kconfig file, so that's another alternative to reconfigure TF-M RAM size.

However, I think using pm_static.yml is the better way, since you will eventually want to have bootloaders and DFU, for which having a static partitioning is highly recommended

RE: Why can't TF-M RAM partition on NRF9151 be smaller than 32KB?

Hieu — Wed, 04 Mar 2026 22:35:56 GMT

You are right. I can't believe I forgot that we can always use pm_static.yml to enforce a fixed memory partitioning.

Regarding measuring maximum usage and how safe it is to reduce the RAM use, I have started in internal inquiry. I will keep you updated.

RE: Why can't TF-M RAM partition on NRF9151 be smaller than 32KB?

Regan0 — Tue, 03 Mar 2026 22:18:27 GMT

Thanks, I'm not prepared to fork sdk-nrf. I've found another way around it if anyone's interested.

In my pm_static.yml file, I've put:

# Force TF-M secure SRAM reservation

# This overrides CONFIG_PM_PARTITION_SIZE_TFM_SRAM defaults from Kconfig.tfm.pm

# even when TFM minimal profile fixes that symbol to 0x8000.

tfm_sram:

address: 0x20000000

size: 0x6000

region: sram_primary

This has lowered TF-M RAM allocation to 24KB. I'm still trying to get to grips with TF-M. Currently, TF-M indicates only 10KB of static RAM use at start-up. Is there a way that I can measure a high-water mark for it? With a minimal implementation, can I get away with only 16KB of RAM set aside?

It seems ridiculous that of a SoC promoted as having 256KB RAM available, 32KB+ disappears to the mandatory TF-M and 17KB+ disappears to modem libraries immediately. That's >16%

RE: Why can't TF-M RAM partition on NRF9151 be smaller than 32KB?

Hieu — Tue, 03 Mar 2026 17:11:33 GMT

Hi Regan0,

I found that the root cause is in this line:
https://github.com/nrfconnect/sdk-nrf/blob/v3.2.3/modules/trusted-firmware-m/Kconfig.tfm.pm#L11

While using CONFIG_TFM_PROFILE_TYPE_MINIMAL, CONFIG_PM_PARTITION_SIZE_TFM_SRAM doesn't have a prompt and therefore can only use the default value.

It seems to be the idea is that the minimal profile is provided as is, without any configuration possible.

The alternative would be to change the SDK file there. Version control of the project might get a little complicated with this approach, because you will need to fork sdk-nrf. Below are some links that will be helpful should you choose this approach.
Application Development
Adding your own code

Hieu