<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Clarification Needed: secp192r1 Support for NRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127239/clarification-needed-secp192r1-support-for-nrf54l15</link><description>Hello, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 We’re starting to implement our solution in an nRF SDK project (version 3.2.2) targeting the nRF54L15 component. From a cryptography standpoint, we will need to use MbedTLS to verify X.509 certificates signed with ECDSA (secp192r1</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:14:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127239/clarification-needed-secp192r1-support-for-nrf54l15" /><item><title>RE: Clarification Needed: secp192r1 Support for NRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562549?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 13:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:86be4a4c-c3f1-42dc-9fa1-5374dd2d9487</guid><dc:creator>mouss</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I fully agree with you. However, existing systems use this curve, and we should still maintain compatibility to communicate with them. Normally, the library should support it as a legacy feature and should not remove it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Clarification Needed: secp192r1 Support for NRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562487?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:03:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:980bb28a-bbb4-4785-b221-9128709d9881</guid><dc:creator>Emil Lenngren</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why are you using secp192r1? According to&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/131/a/r2/final"&gt;csrc.nist.gov/.../final&lt;/a&gt;, that curve is nowadays disallowed for signature generation, and signature verification is only approved for legacy use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Clarification Needed: secp192r1 Support for NRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562456?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:10:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7703a7c2-153f-47a4-a2a8-c2d2bc98f277</guid><dc:creator>mouss</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes the documentation has been updated today.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Clarification Needed: secp192r1 Support for NRF54L15</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562455?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 15:08:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:534b4dd9-8358-494a-a23d-e93f9f257f6e</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd Hellesvik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ncs-latest/page/nrf/security/crypto/crypto_supported_features.html#ecc_curve_types"&gt; ECC curve types&lt;/a&gt;, we can see that secp192k1 and secp192r1 are not supported for the nRF54L series:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1772550484344v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;br /&gt;Sigurd Hellesvik&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>