<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF5340-DK - UART/VCOM names in device tree and schematics</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127300/nrf5340-dk---uart-vcom-names-in-device-tree-and-schematics</link><description>nRF5340-DK, PCA10095, v2.0.1 and v2.0.2 
 According the zephyr device tree, the UART0 is mapped to GPIO 0.19/0.20 and UART1 is mapped to GPIO 1.0/1.1 . 
 According the schematics , page 4, UART1 is mapped to VCOM0 and UART2 is mapped to VCOM2. 
 According</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:35:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127300/nrf5340-dk---uart-vcom-names-in-device-tree-and-schematics" /><item><title>RE: nRF5340-DK - UART/VCOM names in device tree and schematics</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562896?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 09:35:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:888cb2e3-10c6-4344-a0fe-f76a3869dd51</guid><dc:creator>Menon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Achim,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have raised this internally as a potential improvement. If I receive any updates that I can share, I will post them here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for reporting this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abhijith&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5340-DK - UART/VCOM names in device tree and schematics</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562751?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 06:37:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7d7040af-d9b7-40a8-a453-739771020098</guid><dc:creator>Achim Kraus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me recommend to align the names in a next version of the schematics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF5340-DK - UART/VCOM names in device tree and schematics</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/562724?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 13:15:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:06ebda1f-4e8a-4cd7-aea6-0a53311a7713</guid><dc:creator>Menon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;br /&gt;Yes, I understand the confusion here. But what you see inside the schematic is just the label used when designing, so I would say ignore it. The actual behavior is defined by the &lt;code&gt;.dts/overlay&lt;/code&gt;. The pin numbers (like P0.19/0.20) are the only thing that needs to match between the schematic and your code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Abhijith&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>