<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF9151 Hardware Enable/Disable by another MCU with least consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127391/nrf9151-hardware-enable-disable-by-another-mcu-with-least-consumption</link><description>Hello. 
 ****************************** 1 ****************************** 
 
 In the picture above, it&amp;#39;s the original circuit for 9151 in our schematic, for this block of pins of the 9151. The ENABLE pin is constantly tied to level 1 by connecting ENABLE</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:47:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127391/nrf9151-hardware-enable-disable-by-another-mcu-with-least-consumption" /><item><title>RE: nRF9151 Hardware Enable/Disable by another MCU with least consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/563663?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 11:47:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3f2f52a8-7b6d-4e91-9b15-a6021d4559c4</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would have to recommend option 1 and follow our whitepaper, but the choice will ultimately be yours here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF9151 Hardware Enable/Disable by another MCU with least consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/563500?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:57:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:f81b7a22-13fb-4faa-a417-4297c7c993dc</guid><dc:creator>Abomin3v3l</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Simon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We did like this in the PCB, starting with the jumper assembled and the pull-down assembled, and with the pull-up not assembled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-height:240px;max-width:320px;" alt=" " src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/640x480/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/171445.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There will be 4 connections among the 54L15 and the 9151: TX, RX, RTS, CTS.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So that we have 2 options:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Implement this what is shown below, disassembling the jumper and the pull-down and assembling a 10K for R1, so the consmption can go down to 2uA according to the document.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/Ultra-low-power-PPP-connection-using-nRF9151.pdf"&gt;devzone.nordicsemi.com/.../Ultra-low-power-PPP-connection-using-nRF9151.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Or keep the circuit as the first picture, so that maybe we can go even lower than 2uA, because when ENABLE = 0 then supposedly almost all internal hardware of 9151 is disabled. The most of time ENABLE would be kept in 0, so no consumption via the pull-down most of time also. The pull-down is just to guarantee level 0 when the board is just powered-up, while the 54L15 is not forcing yet a specific logic level at the ENABLE pin.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF9151 Hardware Enable/Disable by another MCU with least consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/563109?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b1cee70c-3d1e-4b74-a6d6-a5d729f5ef8e</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jeferson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having a pulldown as in alternative 3 here, will likely draw some current, though not a lot. I think it should be fine to connect it to the nRF54L15 without pulldown since the nRF9151 ENABLE pin is a high impedance pin. You can leave the footprint for the pulldown just in case though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the current consumption, the&amp;nbsp;System Disabled mode the entire device can be powered down by presenting the appropriate voltage to the ENABLE pin. See page 51 of nRF9151 product specification:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf9151/page/nRF9151_html5_keyfeatures.html"&gt;https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/ps_nrf9151/page/nRF9151_html5_keyfeatures.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;If the system disabled mode is used, there shouldn&amp;#39;t be any excess current AFAIK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>