<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Multi-image LwM2M FOTA patch</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127942/multi-image-lwm2m-fota-patch</link><description>Hello, I&amp;#39;m building a multi-image project for an nRF9151: a two-stage bootloader (NSIB + MCUboot) plus two independent non-secure app images. 
 Each app needs to be able to FOTA-update itself, the other app image, and the modem, served as three LwM2M</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:32:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/127942/multi-image-lwm2m-fota-patch" /><item><title>RE: Multi-image LwM2M FOTA patch</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/565746?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:32:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:224cea36-d38c-4fa4-b2a3-31eb7198877f</guid><dc:creator>ovas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, thanks for confirming both points.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Multi-image LwM2M FOTA patch</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/565608?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:06:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d4cfc2ad-4e3d-4321-b567-b4bb8a529304</guid><dc:creator>Hakon</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]Since &lt;strong&gt;fota_download&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;lwm2m_client_utils&lt;/strong&gt; hardcode &lt;strong&gt;img_num=0&lt;/strong&gt;, they don&amp;#39;t support this. I&amp;#39;ve written a patch against the SDK and would like to know whether opening a PR is the right next step.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, this should be fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Multi-image LwM2M FOTA patch</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/565606?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:00:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ccf3c3d6-414a-4324-b5db-37975a1a0cd3</guid><dc:creator>Hakon</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Both the existing code and the new code identify MCUboot primary partitions via PM symbols (&lt;code&gt;PM_MCUBOOT_PRIMARY_ID&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;PM_MCUBOOT_PRIMARY_1_ID&lt;/code&gt;, ...). The 3.3 release notes state PM will be removed by end of 2026, with DTS-based partitioning recommended for new designs &lt;strong&gt;excluding nRF91 Series&lt;/strong&gt;. Since the target here is nRF9151, I read this as PM still being the supported path for this device, so keeping &lt;code&gt;PM_*&lt;/code&gt; references in the patch should be fine. Please correct me if that reading is wrong.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;This is correct. The partition manager will continue to be used for nrf91 series.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>