<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF9151 asset tracker dies in 15–93 days vs expected ~1 year — need help isolating field-vs-lab power gap</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128069/nrf9151-asset-tracker-dies-in-15-93-days-vs-expected-1-year-need-help-isolating-field-vs-lab-power-gap</link><description>Dear Nordic Team, 
 
 We are seeking assistance in resolving a significant power consumption gap observed in our nRF9151-based asset tracker. While our lab testing suggests a battery life of approximately one year, units in the field are failing much</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2017 10:43:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/128069/nrf9151-asset-tracker-dies-in-15-93-days-vs-expected-1-year-need-help-isolating-field-vs-lab-power-gap" /></channel></rss>